-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Protein contaminant ratio #246
Conversation
…Quant, which can subsume multiple MS runs per group.
IMHO ready for merge from our side :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks okay to me, except maybe the "intensity" in the name. The name has "intensity" but the description only talks about "abundance". These two concepts are related but not really equal. "ratio" and "fraction" are also variously used in ways that are unclear. "fraction of total protein" is clear. "ratio" only serves to confuse the issue, I think.
I'm thinking the name would be better "contaminant protein abundance fraction".
point well made. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still think it is better as "contaminant protein abundance fraction", i.e. with contaminant first, because we are talking about "contaminant protein"s and not really "protein contaminant"s.
But adequate as is.
whops. Fixed the name. Thanks Eric. Ready to merge. |
Note: new version assumes that #245 is merged first.