Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protein contaminant ratio #246

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024
Merged

Protein contaminant ratio #246

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

cbielow
Copy link
Contributor

@cbielow cbielow commented Mar 19, 2024

Note: new version assumes that #245 is merged first.

…Quant, which can subsume multiple MS runs per group.
@cbielow
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbielow commented Apr 2, 2024

IMHO ready for merge from our side :)

Copy link
Contributor

@edeutsch edeutsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks okay to me, except maybe the "intensity" in the name. The name has "intensity" but the description only talks about "abundance". These two concepts are related but not really equal. "ratio" and "fraction" are also variously used in ways that are unclear. "fraction of total protein" is clear. "ratio" only serves to confuse the issue, I think.

I'm thinking the name would be better "contaminant protein abundance fraction".

@cbielow
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbielow commented Apr 3, 2024

point well made.
Updated the name accordingly.

Copy link
Contributor

@edeutsch edeutsch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I still think it is better as "contaminant protein abundance fraction", i.e. with contaminant first, because we are talking about "contaminant protein"s and not really "protein contaminant"s.

But adequate as is.

@cbielow
Copy link
Contributor Author

cbielow commented Apr 4, 2024

whops. Fixed the name. Thanks Eric.
Also updated the data-version, so it can be merged directly without relying on #245

Ready to merge.

@mobiusklein mobiusklein added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 5, 2024
Merged via the queue into HUPO-PSI:master with commit bd9b343 Apr 5, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants