-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new spectrum origin type #337
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what about "reduced spectrum for peptide-centric scoring" or "transition list spectrum" or "selected known product ion spectrum"?
The definition is OK, except that it looks a bit run-on. May need a connector "whose" after the first comma.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that the definition is ok, the name takes a bit more effort to parse on its own though.
Maybe instead something like "selected fragment observed intensity spectrum"? The "selected" indicates that only a limited set of peaks are included, the "fragment" implicitly indicates that it's known fragments, thus theoretical m/z, and the "observed intensity" indicates that the intensity values are determined experimentally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 for
"selected fragment observed intensity spectrum"
. It's succinct and conveys the concept and doesn't tie it to any particular domain.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not making it a bit more self explanatory? Unless we really want a short name: "Spectrum containing selected fragment ion peaks and experimental intensity"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
def: "Spectrum for which the peaks are limited to a subset of known product ions that are important for subsequent identification, whose m/z values are corrected to theoretical values, and intensity values are experimentally derived." [PSI:PI]