-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed the Dockerfile #251
Fixed the Dockerfile #251
Conversation
Thanks @StefanLelieveld . If we go this route I'd also like to automate this with github actions. Alternatively, I'm wondering why would we still maintain this instead of pointing to the biocontainer that bioconda builds automatically? then all we have to do is change all the paths to Lemme know what you think |
Hi Hadrien, I just had a chat with Thijs and we like the alternative approach you propose. I will remove the Dockerfile + docker-build.sh and change the docker-image in the README to the biocontainer docker-image you provided. best, |
Update on the matter: The Biocontainer docker image is not build for the ARM architecture (only for AMD?). This might be a reason to use the Dockerfile (and multi-arch build script) to provide support for both architectures in one solution. @HadrienG @ThijsMaas what would your opinion? Support ARM architectures too? |
We're a pure python package. The biocontainer works on my ARM mac despite being built for amd64 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good solution! Lets get this out before user try to test this and it doesn't work for them
Issue: Docker-image is not working correctly for v2.0.0 (locally). And is not working on https://hub.docker.com/r/hadrieng/insilicoseq