-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/filtering #22
Feat/filtering #22
Conversation
…er for speed testing
onmt/transforms/filtering.py
Outdated
|
||
@classmethod | ||
def add_options(cls, parser): | ||
"""Avalilable options relate to this Transform.""" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Avalilable > Available, relate > relating
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
Please rebase so that the PR is mergeable.
…er for speed testing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Can be merged
This pull requests is related to Issue 13: #13
After much discussion on whether we should use opusfilter or not, I have implemented some filters from scratch as it seemed the fastest way. Filters implemented:
Not implemented: