Recipe #266 : Basic Annotation

[glenrobson]

Links

• Original Issue: Full Canvas Annotation cookbook-recipes#266
• Pull Request: 0266 full canvas annotation cookbook-recipes#268
• Preview: https://preview.iiif.io/cookbook/0266-full-canvas-annotation/recipe/0266-full-canvas-annotation/

Background and Summary

This aims to be the most basic annotation example that can be built on by further examples like the #77 recipe. It is a full canvas annotation with a motivation of commenting.

Voting and changes

We welcome comments on the recipe and as well as voting +1, confused face or -1 feel free to add comments to this issue. If this issue is approved then the author will take account of the comments before we merge the branch in to the master cookbook branch.

If the recipe is rejected by the TRC then we will make the changes requested and resubmit it to a future TRC meeting. If you feel that your comments are substantial enough that the recipe should be looked at again by the TRC after the changes have been made please vote -1 (thumbs down). A confused face is treated as abstaining.

Changes to the recipe will only be made after the TRC voting process has concluded.

[nfreire]

I'm in favour of approval.
Nevertheless, a suggestion: in the last paragraph of the implementation notes, add a link to the list of motivation defined by the Web Annotation Model

[thehabes]

Check against the Cookbook Style guide around capitalizing resource types (Manifest, Canvas, Annotation). Also, for camel words like AnnotationPage, we do Annotation Page unless explicitly referencing the value of 'type'. In favor of approval!

[thehabes]

Web Annotation Model motivations : https://www.w3.org/TR/annotation-model/#model-12
IIIF Common Motivations : https://iiif.io/api/presentation/3.0/#35-values

[regisrob]

I just found two typos:

• second sentence: "In this recipe we are annotating the full canvas..."?
• 4th paragraph of the implementation notes: "The Annotations must have have the type Annotation"

[glenrobson]

Issue 78 (Recipe #266 : Basic Annotation)

+1: 24 [awead brndgtl cubap dlpierce emulatingkat glenrobson hadro irv jcreel julsraemy kirschbombe ksclarke mcwhitaker mikeapp mixterj mposton-folger nfreire regisrob rentonsa shuddles thehabes tpendragon triplingual zimeon]
0: 0 []
-1: 0 []
Not TRC: 1 [mapninja]
Ineligible: 1 [gigamorph]

Result: 24 / 24 = 1.00

Super majority is in favor, issue is approved