Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use GradedUnitRanges.map_blocklabels #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

ogauthe
Copy link
Contributor

@ogauthe ogauthe commented Dec 17, 2024

Follow-up from ITensor/GradedUnitRanges.jl#5

Replace SymmetrySectors.map_blocklabels with GradedUnitRanges.map_blocklabels

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.33%. Comparing base (8767c22) to head (9112797).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            main       #6       +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   0.00%   83.33%   +83.33%     
==========================================
  Files         12       13        +1     
  Lines        407      414        +7     
==========================================
+ Hits           0      345      +345     
+ Misses       407       69      -338     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 0.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title use GradedUnitRanges map_blocklabels Use GradedUnitRanges.map_blocklabels Dec 17, 2024
test/Project.toml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit a526711 into ITensor:main Dec 17, 2024
9 checks passed
@ogauthe ogauthe deleted the map_blocklabels branch December 17, 2024 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants