Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to review a video segment #202

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 2, 2020
+21 −1
Merged

How to review a video segment #202

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
de52ad8
How to review a video segment
rrrutledge Dec 23, 2019
0994f56
Detailed review instructions
rrrutledge Dec 28, 2019
6e6e187
Remove review detail from README
rrrutledge Dec 28, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -24,3 +24,23 @@ If the issue applies to the Learning Path in-general but not to any specific sec
[suggestion feature]: https://help.github.com/articles/commenting-on-a-pull-request/#adding-line-comments-to-a-pull-request
[incorporate suggestions]: https://help.github.com/articles/incorporating-feedback-in-your-pull-request/
[project board]: https://github.com/InnerSourceCommons/InnerSourceLearningPath/projects/1

# Review

When reviewing a video:

* Each video should teach all of the information needed to answer the corresponding workbook questions.
* The information in the video should also be harmonious with the corresponding written article,
although the article may provide additional detail not covered in the video.
* The purpose of video review is to ensure that:
* the video relates correctly to its corresponding workbook/article.
* the speaker and message are clear and easy to understand.
* Any comments for video changes should be made directly in the _Screenlight_ tool.
If review of the video prompts an idea for change in the corresponding workbook/article,
then those comments/suggestions should be made against the source text _GitHub_.
* Video comments should focus on non-visual adjustments to make, including:
* Re-recording portions of the audio.
* Adding or editing slides.
* Addition of superimposed banner text.
* Adjustments to respond to comments will be released as a new video in the same folder.
The new video will have a version number in the title.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ We can divide up the work and collaborate on each section via folks from the com
| Speaker | 20 hr | Gives the spoken video for each segment in the section. |
| Speaker Reviewer | 2 hr | |
| Post-Production | 10 hr | Responsible for post-production effects and editing for spoken videos. |
| Post-Production Reviewer | 1 hr | |
| Post-Production Reviewer | 1 hr | Review raw video recordings. |

This list is not an exhaustive a description of all currently open or possible tasks. There are many additional ways to help the learning path effort (please see *How to Get Involved* section...)

Expand Down