Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to support Async #35

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024
Merged

Updates to support Async #35

merged 6 commits into from
Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

mitchelsellers
Copy link
Contributor

@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers commented Mar 21, 2024

This is a breaking change, but needed for long-term support of the downstream libraries!

-Fixes #34

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced asynchronous operations for all IEmailService methods to improve performance and scalability.
    • Expanded IEmailService with new methods for enhanced email customization, including CC, tokens, reply-to functionality, and attachments.
    • Added a new EmailTemplateFactory class for building email content using templates.
  • Refactor
    • Restructured IEmailTemplateFactory interface and updated EmailTemplateSettings for clearer and more direct property definitions.
  • Chores
    • Updated CI/CD workflows by removing the code-quality job and integrating test coverage collection with Codacy.
    • Added a new build job in the release workflow for publishing to NuGet.
  • Documentation
    • Updated README.md to reflect breaking changes in version 7.0 related to asynchronous IEmailService methods.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@mitchelsellers has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1151fa7 and 485c475.

Walkthrough

This series of changes modernizes the project's approach to asynchronous programming and code quality tracking. By shifting focus towards async operations, enhancing email functionality, and integrating with Codacy for coverage analysis, the project aligns better with contemporary development practices. The removal of SonarCloud analysis and the addition of a build job for NuGet publishing indicate a strategic pivot in project tooling and distribution.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci-build.yml Removed SonarCloud analysis; Added test job with coverage; Added Codacy coverage push
.github/workflows/release-build.yml Removed code-quality job; Added build job for NuGet publishing
README.md Updated to reflect async operations in IEmailService methods
src/.../EmailTemplateFactory.cs Restructured IEmailTemplateFactory and added EmailTemplateFactory class with documentation
src/.../EmailTemplateSettings.cs Refactored to flatten class structure and added XML documentation
src/.../IEmailService.cs Expanded to include async methods with enhanced email customization options

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Adjust to prefer async for message formats (#34)

Poem

🐇✉️🚀

In the land of code and byte,
A rabbit hopped through day and night.
With async magic in its leap,
It transformed code, so vast, so deep.

"To the future!" it squeaked with glee,
As it danced around the Git tree.
Emails fly, no longer slow,
In the burrow, where ideas grow.

🌟📧🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42e7cd2 and 30364c7.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • GitVersion.yml is excluded by: !**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/ci-build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release-build.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateFactory.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateSettings.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/IEmailService.cs (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateSettings.cs (1)
  • 5-18: The refactoring of the EmailTemplateSettings class and the addition of XML documentation comments enhance clarity and maintainability. Good job on making these changes.
.github/workflows/release-build.yml (1)
  • 5-11: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [8-37]

The modifications to the release-build.yml workflow, including the removal of the code-quality job and the addition of the build job, are well-implemented. The workflow is correctly set up for building and publishing the project to NuGet.

.github/workflows/ci-build.yml (2)
  • 41-42: The addition of the Test job for running tests with coverage collection is correctly implemented and follows best practices for .NET projects.
  • 44-52: The Push Coverage to Codacy job is well-configured for sending coverage data to Codacy, enhancing the project's code quality tracking. The use of environment variables for sensitive data is commendable.
src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateFactory.cs (2)
  • 9-28: The IEmailTemplateFactory interface is well-documented, providing clear guidance on how to use the BuildEmailContent method. The inclusion of exceptions in the documentation is a good practice for clarity.
  • 31-77: The EmailTemplateFactory class is implemented correctly, adhering to best practices for dependency injection and exception handling. The BuildEmailContent method is efficient and well-documented, making good use of StringBuilder for string manipulation.

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/IEmailService.cs Show resolved Hide resolved
mitchelsellers and others added 2 commits March 20, 2024 22:47
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30364c7 and 1151fa7.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-build.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-build.yml

@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers merged commit b54c09c into develop Mar 21, 2024
1 check passed
@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers deleted the feature/update-async branch March 21, 2024 03:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adjust to prefer async for message formats
2 participants