-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates to support Async #35
Conversation
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@mitchelsellers has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 0 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThis series of changes modernizes the project's approach to asynchronous programming and code quality tracking. By shifting focus towards async operations, enhancing email functionality, and integrating with Codacy for coverage analysis, the project aligns better with contemporary development practices. The removal of SonarCloud analysis and the addition of a build job for NuGet publishing indicate a strategic pivot in project tooling and distribution. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
GitVersion.yml
is excluded by:!**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/ci-build.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-build.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateFactory.cs (1 hunks)
- src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateSettings.cs (1 hunks)
- src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/IEmailService.cs (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateSettings.cs (1)
- 5-18: The refactoring of the
EmailTemplateSettings
class and the addition of XML documentation comments enhance clarity and maintainability. Good job on making these changes..github/workflows/release-build.yml (1)
- 5-11: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [8-37]
The modifications to the
release-build.yml
workflow, including the removal of thecode-quality
job and the addition of thebuild
job, are well-implemented. The workflow is correctly set up for building and publishing the project to NuGet..github/workflows/ci-build.yml (2)
- 41-42: The addition of the
Test
job for running tests with coverage collection is correctly implemented and follows best practices for .NET projects.- 44-52: The
Push Coverage to Codacy
job is well-configured for sending coverage data to Codacy, enhancing the project's code quality tracking. The use of environment variables for sensitive data is commendable.src/NetCore.Utilities.Email/EmailTemplateFactory.cs (2)
- 9-28: The
IEmailTemplateFactory
interface is well-documented, providing clear guidance on how to use theBuildEmailContent
method. The inclusion of exceptions in the documentation is a good practice for clarity.- 31-77: The
EmailTemplateFactory
class is implemented correctly, adhering to best practices for dependency injection and exception handling. TheBuildEmailContent
method is efficient and well-documented, making good use ofStringBuilder
for string manipulation.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci-build.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/ci-build.yml
This is a breaking change, but needed for long-term support of the downstream libraries!
-Fixes #34
Summary by CodeRabbit
IEmailService
methods to improve performance and scalability.IEmailService
with new methods for enhanced email customization, including CC, tokens, reply-to functionality, and attachments.EmailTemplateFactory
class for building email content using templates.IEmailTemplateFactory
interface and updatedEmailTemplateSettings
for clearer and more direct property definitions.README.md
to reflect breaking changes in version 7.0 related to asynchronousIEmailService
methods.