Update ajv to version 5.1.0 🚀 #43
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello lovely humans,
ajv just published its new version 5.1.0.
This version is not covered by your current version range.
Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.
I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of ajv.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.
Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?
There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.
Good luck with your project ✨
You rock!
🌴
GitHub Release
Changed order of type validation - "type" keyword is now validated before keywords that apply to all types.
The new version differs by 439 commits .
d2cb3285.1.0a8d91c5Merge pull request #488 from epoberezkin/type-validationa02b9a6refactor: make sure "type": "integer" is vaildated before other keywords, closes #485f60fedbfeat: validate types before other keywords, #4856f0ff64docs: fix example for additionalProperties keyword78fffdeMerge pull request #479 from handrews/error-doca71cecedocs: FAQ for additionalProperties error messages4504e97version 5.0.13aa523eMerge branch 'v4'de9fad5version 4.11.84ed756efix: duplicate "type" error is reported with coerceTypes option, fixes #46992bfedatest: skipped test for error reporting with coerceTypes option, #4699802e23docs: migration note04852b1Merge pull request #473 from mrjgreen/patch-1b5661ebUpdate README.mdThere are 250 commits in total. See the full diff.