Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inconsistent spelling in JOSS paper #47

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Fix inconsistent spelling in JOSS paper #47

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions paper/paper.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Since this is a time-consuming, not to mention tedious, procedure and introduces
The advantage of this approach is the complete integration of all relevant parameters – i.e. baseline, peak area and height, mean, signal-to-noise ratio etc. – into one single model through which all parameters are estimated simultaneously.
Furthermore, Bayesian inference comes with uncertainty quantification for all peak model parameters, and thus does not merely yield a point estimate as would commonly be the case.
It also grants access to novel metrics for avoiding false positives and negatives by rejecting signals where a) a convergence criterion of the peak fitting procedure was not fulfilled or b) the uncertainty of the estimated parameters exceeded a user-defined threshold.
By employing peak fitting to uncover peak parameters – most importantly the area – this approach thus differs from recent applications of Bayesian statistics to chromatographic peak data which e.g. focussed on peak detection [@vivo2012bayesian; @woldegebriel2015probabilistic], method optimization [@wiczling2016much] and simulations of chromatography [@briskot2019prediction; @yamamoto2021uncertainty].
By employing peak fitting to uncover peak parameters – most importantly the area – this approach thus differs from recent applications of Bayesian statistics to chromatographic peak data which e.g. focused on peak detection [@vivo2012bayesian; @woldegebriel2015probabilistic], method optimization [@wiczling2016much] and simulations of chromatography [@briskot2019prediction; @yamamoto2021uncertainty].
The first studies to be published about this topic contain perhaps the technique most similar in spirit to the present one since functions made of an idealized peak shape and a noise term are fitted but beyond this common starting point the methodology is quite distinct [@kelly1971estimation; @kelly1971application].

# Materials and Methods
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -138,6 +138,6 @@ The authors thank Tobias Latour for providing experimental LC-MS/MS data for the
No competing interest is declared.

### Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in version 0.7.1 of the [Zenodo record](https://zenodo.org/records/11189842).
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in version 0.7.1 of the [Zenodo record](https://zenodo.org/records/11189842).

# Bibliography
Loading