-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update CSV.read docs about WeakRefString conversions #118
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR! This looks like a nice small clarification, so I feel sorry for my lengthy comment ;) :
String
has to be fixed too since it is a "standard Julia string type".string.(::WeakRefString)
will work, but::WeakRefString
is not a type of the columnAn alternative:
"
To convert
wstr::WeakRefString
to a standard Julia string type, just callstring(wstr)
, orstring.(df[:wstr])
to convert an entirewstr
column ofdf
table."
However, the problem with this approach is that missing values in
df[:wstr]
would be converted into "missing" strings.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Woops, good catch. So I guess the only correct approach is
convert(Union{String, Missing}, ::WeakRefString)
andconvert(Array{Union{String, Missing}}, ::AbstractArray{WeakRefString})
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I follow... is that a problem? Or do you mean they'd become
""
instead ofMissings.missing
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also think so. More precisely, the scalar form
convert(Union{String, Missing}, wstr)
would give the correct result both forwstr::WeakRefString
andwstr === missing
.But
convert(Array{Union{String, Missing}}, wstr)
should only be called forwstr::AbstractArray{Union{WeakRefString, Missing}}
unless we want to allow missingness.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nickeubank
string.(wstr::AbstractArray{Union{WeakRefString, Missing}})
doesn't preserve missingness: yourMissings.missing
missing values in the array would become non-missing strings"missing"::String
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unfortunately
Maybe it's somehow related to this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like
WeakRefStringArray
is lying about its eltype: it should beString
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
WeakRefString
toString
conversion is now supposed to be handled automatically, maybe we don't need this docstring section at all :)I guess we need @quinnj assistance to clarify the situation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See JuliaData/WeakRefStrings.jl#17.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And regarding the original problem that the eltype is
Any
, see JuliaLang/julia#24332.So I guess the only solution for now is to recommend using either
convert(Array{String}, x)
orconvert(Array{Union{String, Missing}}, x)
depending on whether you want to support missing values or not.