Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #38015 - Enable org and CVE scoping for flatpak content #11251

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sjha4
Copy link
Member

@sjha4 sjha4 commented Dec 9, 2024

What are the changes introduced in this pull request?

Considerations taken when implementing this change?

  1. Use host's IP address to identify and then filter content based on host's repositories.
  2. If host is not identified, send the unfiltered flatpak index and allow normal flatpak operations. We could switch this tonot showing anything in the future once users are more accustomed to the flow?

What are the testing steps for this pull request?

Sync a few flatpak repos in different orgs and add them to some content view.
Create activation keys for those CVEs and then register a host using the key.
Setup a host to consume flatpak content from the katello server.
Try flatpak remote-ls and ensure you only see repos the host has access to.

@sjha4 sjha4 force-pushed the org_scope_flatpaks branch 2 times, most recently from eb3bc3d to 6bb32d1 Compare December 16, 2024 17:58
@sjha4 sjha4 changed the title Early Draft: Enable org and CVE scoping for flatpak content Enable org and CVE scoping for flatpak content Dec 16, 2024
@sjha4 sjha4 force-pushed the org_scope_flatpaks branch from 6bb32d1 to 6f1e993 Compare December 16, 2024 20:01
@sjha4 sjha4 force-pushed the org_scope_flatpaks branch from 6f1e993 to 8373f5a Compare December 17, 2024 14:46
@sjha4 sjha4 changed the title Enable org and CVE scoping for flatpak content Fixes #38015 - Enable org and CVE scoping for flatpak content Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant