Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refreshed list of maintainers following 2023 survey #324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

PhilReedData
Copy link
Contributor

LC CAC have checked with the maintainers following the survey in 2023 as discussed by email with Phil Reed, Jennifer Stubs and Owen Stephens.

LC CAC have checked with the maintainers following the survey in 2023.
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 20, 2023

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/LibraryCarpentry/lc-open-refine/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-324

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:


What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2023-11-20 19:22:55 +0000

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
@jas58
Copy link
Contributor

jas58 commented Nov 20, 2023

@ostephens Would you like to be "lead"?

@ostephens
Copy link
Contributor

@jas58 I'm very happy either way - I think you tend to be a bit more organised than I am and tend to keep up with the Carpentries and maintainer community better, so I think (if you are happy) it's appropriate for you to be lead - as long as you are happy?

@jas58 jas58 merged commit 4a0a536 into LibraryCarpentry:main Nov 22, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants