Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade errors for additive and deponly policies #20695

Conversation

jordanjennings-mysten
Copy link
Contributor

@jordanjennings-mysten jordanjennings-mysten commented Dec 19, 2024

Description

support additive and deponly policies for upgrade errors

Test plan

snapshot testing


Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

  • Protocol:
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:

Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sui-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 8, 2025 1:26am
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
multisig-toolkit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 8, 2025 1:26am
sui-kiosk ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 8, 2025 1:26am
sui-typescript-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jan 8, 2025 1:26am

Copy link
Member

@amnn amnn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some small questions here and there, but otherwise good to go!

crates/sui/src/upgrade_compatibility.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
impl InclusionCheckMode for CliInclusionCheckMode {
type Error = Vec<UpgradeCompatibilityModeError>;

fn module_name_mismatch(&mut self, _old_address: &Identifier, _new_address: &Identifier) {}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is a module name mismatch even possible? I thought we performed this check by first lining up modules by their name. Should this case be removed from the interface?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jordanjennings-mysten jordanjennings-mysten Jan 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the move here is to bundle name and address check into a single module_id_mismatch as compatibility check does so at least we don't have an extra function just for the name check. I'll do it in another smaller PR since it affects code outside of the sui crate.

crates/sui/src/upgrade_compatibility.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/sui/src/upgrade_compatibility.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
crates/sui/src/upgrade_compatibility.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jordanjennings-mysten jordanjennings-mysten temporarily deployed to sui-typescript-aws-kms-test-env January 8, 2025 01:25 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@jordanjennings-mysten jordanjennings-mysten merged commit c378799 into MystenLabs:main Jan 8, 2025
48 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants