Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[production/RRFS.v1] a new parameter to fix REFS member crash and new ccpp suites for RRFS fire weather #864

Merged

Conversation

JiliDong-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@JiliDong-NOAA JiliDong-NOAA commented Aug 22, 2024

Description

  1. After RRFS cycled DA switched to using saSAS, REFS members using G-F convection failed due to missing restarting variables. This PR will add a new parameter to control whether G-F will be cold started or not. The parameter will be set to false by default and won't affect any existing code logic/structure.

  2. New ccpp suites are added to support RRFS fire weather

(Instructions: this, and all subsequent sections of text should be removed and filled in as appropriate.)
Provide a detailed description of what this PR does.
What bug does it fix, or what feature does it add?
Is a change of answers expected from this PR?

Issue(s) addressed

Link the issues to be closed with this PR, whether in this repository, or in another repository.
(Remember, issues should always be created before starting work on a PR branch!)

  • fixes #<issue_number>
  • fixes noaa-emc/fv3atm/issues/<issue_number>

Testing

How were these changes tested?
What compilers / HPCs was it tested with?
Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?)
Have the ufs-weather-model regression test been run? On what platform?

  • Will the code updates change regression test baseline? If yes, why? Please show the baseline directory below.
  • Please commit the regression test log files in your ufs-weather-model branch

Dependencies

ufs-community/ccpp-physics#221

If testing this branch requires non-default branches in other repositories, list them.
Those branches should have matching names (ideally)

Do PRs in upstream repositories need to be merged first?
If so add the "waiting for other repos" label and list the upstream PRs

  • waiting on noaa-emc/nems/pull/<pr_number>
  • waiting on noaa-emc/fv3atm/pull/<pr_number>

Requirements before merging

  • All new code in this PR is tested by at least one unit test
  • All new code in this PR includes Doxygen documentation
  • All new code in this PR does not add new compilation warnings (check CI output)

@MatthewPyle-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@JiliDong-NOAA is this fv3atm change ready to merge?

@JiliDong-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@MatthewPyle-NOAA I think so. .gitmodules has been reverted with submodule updated.

@MatthewPyle-NOAA MatthewPyle-NOAA merged commit 479afa9 into NOAA-EMC:production/RRFS.v1 Sep 4, 2024
@JiliDong-NOAA JiliDong-NOAA deleted the fix_ens_crash branch September 5, 2024 18:53
grantfirl pushed a commit to grantfirl/fv3atm that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
… ccpp suites for RRFS fire weather (NOAA-EMC#864)

* a new parameter is added to control whether G-F will be cold started or not; new ccpp suites are added to support RRFS fire weather prediction
jkbk2004 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
* [production/RRFS.v1] a new parameter to fix REFS member crash and new ccpp suites for RRFS fire weather (#864)

* a new parameter is added to control whether G-F will be cold started or not; new ccpp suites are added to support RRFS fire weather prediction

* fix RRFS_sas_nogwd suite name inconsistency (#868)

* Add is_init flag for GFS_phys_time_vary to ccpp/data/GFS_typedefs.{F90,meta} and fix bug for Thompson MP init flag (used uninitialized, correct by coincidence)

* update suites with GFS_photochemistry

---------

Co-authored-by: Jili Dong <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dom Heinzeller <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants