add scoring filter

[gcroci2]

In this PR I add the scoring filter component. Some comments:

• A dictionary containing links data is now also saved in process_uploaded_data
• At this stage I've implemented filtering in the scoring only for the metcalf method (the only one implemented in the NPLinker)
• Added tests (and fixed the old ones) and docstrings

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

[CunliangGeng]

Is it ready for review?

[gcroci2]

Is it ready for review?

It is not finished, but I have questions before I keep working on it (see the very first comment) @CunliangGeng

[CunliangGeng]

Here are my thoughts on your questions:

Do we want to already have in place the OR/AND logic for the future methods? (in gm_scoring_apply) We can't really test it since we have only one possible scoring method atm

No, we only add them when applicable/needed. Also, we don't need to implement the options for rosetta scoring at the moment. So now we'll only implement the following part:

Please keep the selection of scoring methods possible though it's only one choice now.

How do we want to limit the scoring filter functionality? For example, we could disable it if there are no selected rows in the Data selection table above

Keeping it always enabled and wrapped would make interaction between data table and scoring filter easier.
When needed, users can unwrap it and set the options; otherwise, the default method and values are used.
If there is no selected rows, clicking Show spectra will show an warning message instead of the candidate links table.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
5 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[CunliangGeng]

Looks great! Just one thing: better to move the button Set Scoring outside of scoring container and rename it as e.g. "Show results"? You could work on it in next PR.

[gcroci2]

Looks great! Just one thing: better to move the button Set Scoring outside of scoring container and rename it as e.g. "Show results"? You could work on it in next PR.

Okay I've added this point to the next issue (#33)