Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add print method for operational cost types #1049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jd-lara
Copy link
Member

@jd-lara jd-lara commented Feb 6, 2024

Interim fix for #1048

@jd-lara jd-lara requested a review from GabrielKS February 6, 2024 22:07
@jd-lara jd-lara self-assigned this Feb 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (19f649c) 85.38% compared to head (884ebc0) 85.31%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1049      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.38%   85.31%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         170      170              
  Lines        7689     7695       +6     
==========================================
  Hits         6565     6565              
- Misses       1124     1130       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 85.31% <0.00%> (-0.07%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
src/utils/print.jl 87.32% <0.00%> (-3.86%) ⬇️

Copy link
Collaborator

@GabrielKS GabrielKS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@jd-lara jd-lara merged commit 700e8a7 into main Feb 12, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@jd-lara jd-lara deleted the jd/batt_cost_improvements branch February 15, 2024 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants