Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move DataMovementManager to nnf-sos and rename to NnfDataMovementManager #137

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

bdevcich
Copy link
Contributor

@bdevcich bdevcich commented Nov 8, 2023

This moves DMM to nnf-sos so that nnf-sos can use the DMM. This enables
nnf-sos to check if the DMM is ready before proceeding with
copy_in/copy_out directives.

  • Moved type.go file and rbac roles to nnf-sos
  • Removed crd/ - there are no data movement types defined here anymore
  • Added README.md to api to explain the types are in nnf-sos
  • Update references to NnfDataMovementManager and also NnfDataMovement
  • Re-vendored nnf-sos

This moves DMM to nnf-sos so that nnf-sos can use the DMM. This enables
nnf-sos to check if the DMM is ready before proceeding with
copy_in/copy_out directives.

* Moved type.go file and rbac roles to nnf-sos
* Removed `crd/` - there are no data movement types defined here anymore
* Added README.md to `api` to explain the types are in nnf-sos
* Update references to NnfDataMovementManager and also NnfDataMovement
* Re-vendored nnf-sos
Readme.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
config/manager/manager.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@NateThornton NateThornton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you doing this just to erase my existence from the codebase?

@bdevcich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Are you doing this just to erase my existence from the codebase?

Haha, yes 😉

But also, we need sos to be able to check when dmm is ready. I have an additional PR coming that ties the worker daemonset status into DMM's ready flag. So when things like global lustre are still being mounted into the workers, sos doesn't try to do data movement.

@bdevcich bdevcich merged commit 9b94462 into master Nov 14, 2023
4 checks passed
@bdevcich bdevcich deleted the move-dmm branch November 14, 2023 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants