Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enable multi-tx bytecode test #201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024
Merged

enable multi-tx bytecode test #201

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

oclaw
Copy link
Contributor

@oclaw oclaw commented Dec 12, 2024

Due to incompleted bytecode circuit (in terms of metadata) #196
I have recollected multi-tx traces with solc --no-cbor-metadata. With such code the current bytecode circuit check passes

Until the research team decides how should we handle metadata - let's not handle it :)

@oclaw oclaw requested review from akokoshn and makxenov December 12, 2024 15:47
Copy link

Gcc Test Results

  160 files  ±0    160 suites  ±0   19m 15s ⏱️ -1s
3 178 tests ±0  3 172 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
3 266 runs  ±0  3 260 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 82f8c17. ± Comparison against base commit d8178a9.

Copy link

Clang Test Results

  160 files  ±0    160 suites  ±0   18m 2s ⏱️ -17s
3 178 tests ±0  3 172 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
3 266 runs  ±0  3 260 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 82f8c17. ± Comparison against base commit d8178a9.

@oclaw oclaw added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 44b08a8 Dec 12, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants