Update tree-sitter grammars

[DPDmancul]

Description of changes

Updated tree-sitter grammars, both using the update.nix and manually updating grammars for which there is no recent release.

For a lot of grammars this update is important because they were not compatible with the tree-sitter parser version, leading to errors like nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter#3092

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[shazow]

Confirmed that this fixes almost all of the errors in :checkhealth nvim-treesitter, only ones remaining for me is julia, gdscript, and erlang.

Worth merging!

[vale981]

maybe, we shoudl ping the maintainer. the outdated grammars are quite annoying

[jasonjckn]

@DPDmancul @figsoda I'm confused why this isn't merged yet, if can help lmk.

[figsoda]

This isn't merged because this introduces some manual updates that might get overwritten by the update script the next time it is updated, and there doesn't seem to be a consensus on whether this PR or #244696 is preferred

Also what seems like the original motivation of the update (nvim-treesitter errors) should be resolved now, I wonder if a regular tree-sitter grammar update would be sufficient for your use case? @jasonjckn

[jasonjckn]

@figsoda yes it is a would, i just need a more recent julia grammar

[akirak]

Any updates? The other PR (#244696) has been closed, and quite a few grammars seem to be a bit outdated now.

there doesn't seem to be a consensus on whether this PR or #244696 is preferred

[ck3d]

This PR has merge conflicts. Can you please rebase your PR

[loicreynier]

Also the following should be appended to ignoredTreeSitterOrgRepos in update.nix:

ignoredTreeSitterOrgRepos = [
  "..."
  # GitHub org page and actions
  ".github"
  "workflows"
  "fuzz-action"
  "parse-action"
  "parser-setup-action"
  "parser-test-action"
  "parser-update-action"
  "setup-action"
];