blackmagic: 1.8.2 -> 1.10.2

[carlossless]

DISCLAIMER: I am aware that due to this PR reincluding an older version of gcc-arm-embedded (12.2.rel1) it won't be merged. I thought it still might be worthwhile to open it up as a reference for others and/or a place where to discuss possible workarounds.

blackmagic v2.0 should come out in a few months and it should build successfully with more recent versions of gcc-arm-embedded thanks to this.

---

Changes for v1.10.2 - https://github.com/blackmagic-debug/blackmagic/releases/tag/v1.10.2
Changes between v1.8.2 and v1.10.2 - blackmagic-debug/blackmagic@v1.8.2...v1.10.2

gcc-arm-embedded v12.2.rel1 is repackaged and included because it's the most recent version where v1.10.2 still builds - blackmagic-debug/blackmagic#1978

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[prusnak]

can you try building with gcc-arm-embedded-11?

[carlossless]

can you try building with gcc-arm-embedded-11?

I forgot to mention that I excluded gcc-arm-embedded-11 because it doesn't support aarch64-darwin which is one of the platforms that I needed blackmagic to work on. I'm guessing that it would succeed in building it on the platforms that it does support but have not tested it.

[carlossless]

@prusnak I checked and I can confirm that this version builds with gcc-arm-embedded-11 on x86_64-linux

[prusnak]

Reading the issue and comment blackmagic-debug/blackmagic#1978 (comment), I feel we should just close it for now and wait for blackmagic 2.0.x.

The PR will be useful for someone who wants to build 1.10x though, so thanks!