-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ngtcp2-gnutls: 1.8.0 -> 1.9.1 #355866
ngtcp2-gnutls: 1.8.0 -> 1.9.1 #355866
Conversation
That's |
|
44376ea
to
2ee0147
Compare
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/ngtcp2/ngtcp2/releases. meta.description for ngtcp2-gnutls is: Effort to implement RFC9000 QUIC protocol meta.homepage for ngtcp2-gnutls is: https://github.com/ngtcp2/ngtcp2 Updates performed
To inspect upstream changesImpactChecks done
Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.) Or, build yourself:
Or:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build resultsWe have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
|
Looks good now. Probably no sense in waiting for ofBorg for such a simple change. |
Successfully created backport PR for |
Git push to origin failed for release-24.11 with exitcode 1 |
Rethought the labeling. It seems unlikely that anyone (beyond upstream knot-dns devs) uses functionality affected by this CVE-2024-52811. |
Automatic update generated by nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://github.com/ngtcp2/ngtcp2/releases.
meta.description for ngtcp2-gnutls is: Effort to implement RFC9000 QUIC protocol
meta.homepage for ngtcp2-gnutls is: https://github.com/ngtcp2/ngtcp2
Updates performed
To inspect upstream changes
Release on GitHub
Compare changes on GitHub
Impact
Checks done
Caution
A test defined in
passthru.tests
did not pass.Rebuild report (if merged into master) (click to expand)
Instructions to test this update (click to expand)
Either download from Cachix:
(The Cachix cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the Cachix download to work, your user must be in the
trusted-users
list or you can usesudo
since root is effectively trusted.Or, build yourself:
Or:
After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
Pre-merge build results
We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.
This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as failed to build independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.
nixpkgs-review
resultGenerated using
nixpkgs-review
.Command:
nixpkgs-review
x86_64-linux
✅ 13 packages built:
Maintainer pings
cc @vcunat for testing.
Tip
As a maintainer, if your package is located under
pkgs/by-name/*
, you can comment@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge
to automatically merge this update using thenixpkgs-merge-bot
.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.