zfs_2_1: remove #358811
Open
zfs_2_1: remove #358811
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
6.topic: nixos
nix-owners
bot
requested review from
infinisil,
LeSuisse,
mweinelt,
philiptaron,
RaitoBezarius and
risicle
13 tasks
|
Stray shell script? |
Mic92
force-pushed
the
zfs-21-removal
branch
from
453fa80 to
6eb30e3
Compare
github-actions
bot
removed
the
6.topic: continuous integration
|
Removed. |
philiptaron
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2024
ofborg
bot
added
8.has: clean-up
10.rebuild-darwin: 0
|
2.1 is probably not going anywhere and is going to be maintained in various
places.
Nonetheless, I do not plan to maintain ZFS anymore in nixpkgs. So I think
it's the right choice to deprecate it until someone wants to pick up that.
By the way, this is missing the removal of the series specific file.
Le jeu. 5 déc. 2024, 01:25, Adam C. Stephens ***@***.***> a
écrit :
… Yet, https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.1.16
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#358811 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACMZRFVKCSCF723ZEQ5DP32D6MPDAVCNFSM6AAAAABSMVBO32VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKMJYHAZDSMRWGA>
.
You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
github-actions
bot
added
the
6.topic: continuous integration
adamcstephens
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
wegank
added
the
12.approvals: 2
|
Shouldn't we add an alias? |
|
@SuperSandro2000 an alias to what? |
|
@Mic92 this needs a rebase. I'm fine removing from unstable, but we'll keep supporting in 24.11. |
To a throw to have a cleaner deprecation. |
With the release of 2.3.0-rc, we know that 2.3.0 will be coming sometime soon. Per the [ZFS release policy][1], only the current and previous releases are expected to be supported, so 2.1.x will become unsupported. Unfortunately upstream does not have any specific timelines, so we do not know when it will become unsupported, but when it does we will likely backport the removal. As such, begin warning of imminent removal. [1]: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/blob/6187b194349c5a728c9df8c6842f1866d5c9782a/RELEASES.md
Mic92
force-pushed
the
zfs-21-removal
branch
from
1a56781 to
cbc50da
Compare
wegank
removed
the
12.approvals: 2
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated version of #352402
waiting for https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.3.0
With the release of 2.3.0-rc, we know that 2.3.0 will be coming sometime soon. Per the ZFS release policy, only the current and previous releases are expected to be supported, so 2.1.x will become unsupported. Unfortunately upstream does not have any specific timelines, so we do not know when it will become unsupported, but when it does we will likely backport the removal. As such, begin warning of imminent removal.
Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.