[24.11]: pnpm_10: init at 10.0.0

[Scrumplex]

Partial backport of #371832

(cherry picked from commit 1187945)

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[gepbird]

Shouldn't we also backport pinning pnpm to pnpm_9 (#374000)? If we don't do that I think there will be many failed automatic package backports.

[Scrumplex]

Shouldn't we also backport pinning pnpm to pnpm_9 (#374000)? If we don't do that I think there will be many failed automatic package backports.

Sure, but we would have to skip the change that switches pnpm to pnpm_10

[wolfgangwalther]

Let's do #374000 instead.