Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] account_statement_import_online_gocardless: Bugs after the refactoring #712

Conversation

pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

After the refactoring in #686, this doesn't work anymore:

  • The API URL didn't end in "/", so the join_url doesn't do correctly the join.
  • There's an infinite loop when getting the headers for getting the token.

@Tecnativa

…ctoring

After the refactoring in OCA#686, this doesn't work anymore:

- The API URL didn't end in "/", so the join_url doesn't do correctly
  the join.
- There's an infinite loop when getting the headers for getting the
  token.
@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Aug 9, 2024
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member Author

@ljsalvatierra-factorlibre please do a real test next time before doing such refactorings.

/ocabot merge patch

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-712-by-pedrobaeza-bump-patch, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit f5509b3 into OCA:16.0 Aug 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 748265b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 16.0-fix-account_statement_import_online-wrong_ref branch August 9, 2024 16:34
@cyberbizee

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@ljsalvatierra-factorlibre
Copy link
Contributor

@ljsalvatierra-factorlibre please do a real test next time before doing such refactorings.

/ocabot merge patch

Apologies and thank you for the fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants