Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

16.0 mig purchase order ubl #871

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

IT-Ideas
Copy link

No description provided.

alexis-via and others added 30 commits November 22, 2023 12:36
…ort_ubl and purchase_order_ubl

Move XSD files to base_ubl, to avoid duplication of UBL XSD files.
Add support for partner bank matching on invoice update (before, it was only supported on invoice creation)
Prepare v10 branch

Rename __openerp__.py to __manifest__.py and set installable to False

Also port all the modules that generate the XML documents: account_invoice_ubl, account_invoice_zugferd, purchase_order_ubl and sale_order_ubl

Rename account_invoice_zugferd to account_invoice_factur-x

Rename account_invoice_import_zugferd to account_invoice_import_factur-x
Add module to support py3o reporting engine:

Continue port of modules for v10.0, in particular sale_order_import_* module

Fix spelling mistake and other remarks on README by Tarteo

Disable get_pdf() in all tests because it doesn't work in Travis

[10.0] restore get_pdf() in tests (OCA#31)

* sale_order_ubl + purchase_order_ubl: restore get_pdf() in tests using HttpCase

* Restore get_pdf() in tests of account_invoice_factur-x and account_invoice_ubl modules

* Update oca_dependencies.txt
[UPD] Update purchase_order_ubl.pot

[UPD] README.rst

[ADD] icon.png
Currently translated at 60.0% (3 of 5 strings)

Translation: edi-14.0/edi-14.0-purchase_order_ubl
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/edi-14-0/edi-14-0-purchase_order_ubl/fr/
In some places odoo is passing a single ID instead of a list as expected.
@IT-Ideas IT-Ideas force-pushed the 16.0-mig-purchase_order_ubl branch 2 times, most recently from 1df3a26 to fafb790 Compare November 28, 2023 16:56
@IT-Ideas IT-Ideas force-pushed the 16.0-mig-purchase_order_ubl branch from fafb790 to c1a5f8e Compare November 28, 2023 17:21
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Mar 31, 2024
@IT-Ideas
Copy link
Author

@sbidoul do you know who should I ping? Maybe should I add tests?

@IT-Ideas
Copy link
Author

@alexis-via?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Apr 7, 2024
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Aug 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Sep 15, 2024
@jbaudoux jbaudoux reopened this Dec 5, 2024
@jbaudoux
Copy link
Contributor

jbaudoux commented Dec 5, 2024

@IT-Ideas A reason why this is still in draft ?

@IT-Ideas
Copy link
Author

IT-Ideas commented Dec 5, 2024

@IT-Ideas A reason why this is still in draft ?

Nope, not really :)

@IT-Ideas IT-Ideas marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 20:31
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Dec 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants