-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dns: more keywords; plus some eve/keyword parity tooling - v6 #12652
Draft
jasonish
wants to merge
13
commits into
OISF:master
Choose a base branch
from
jasonish:ish/dns/feat-7012/v6
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1,021
−275
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
15dd20d
dns: add dns.response sticky buffer
scrivs86 f58267e
doc/userguide: document dns.response
scrivs86 364057c
dns: rename dns.response keyword to dns.response.rrname
jasonish 5702306
detect-dns-response: disable clang-format around byte arrays
jasonish 78e9c45
dns: refactor function to get rrname to be safe
jasonish b58ed81
detect: split new keyword id from registration
jasonish 3fe80bd
dns: add keywords for additionals and authorities rrnames
jasonish 76f5697
schema: add an object for mapping fields to keywords
jasonish 38f5fda
script/eve-parity: add script for checking eve/keyword parity
jasonish 9ba7a28
detect-dns-response: remove unit tests
jasonish 298262b
schema: mark "stats" and "drop" as having no keywords
jasonish 41e2534
schema: mark dns.version and dns.grouped as having no keywords
jasonish 762e73e
eve-parity: skip transform keywords
jasonish File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it good to have this
suricata.keyword
that can either be a boolean or an array ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm ok with it, unless its going into something the hardcodes a schema based on whats first seen., so not in eve. Prevents conflict with another field as well..