Fix failed tests and add more tests

[Yiling-J]

No description provided.

[starship-github]

🚀 The StarShip CodeReviewer has been triggered with action(s): review, evaluate, describe, linter.

[starship-github]

Linter Issue Report

During the code review, a list issues were found. These issues could affect the code quality, maintainability, and consistency. Below is the detailed Linter issue report:

builder/sensitive/aliyun_green.go

Lint Issue: undefined: SensitiveChecker

• Location: Line 83, Column 7
• Code Snippet:

  var _ SensitiveChecker = (*AliyunGreenChecker)(nil)

• Suggestion: Ensure that the interface SensitiveChecker is defined within the project or imported correctly. If it's meant to be part of an external package, verify that the package is imported and the interface name is spelled correctly.

Lint Issue: undefined: CheckResult

• Location: Line 121, Column 85
• Code Snippet:

  return &CheckResult{IsSensitive: true, Reason: result.Label}, nil

• Suggestion: Confirm that the CheckResult type is defined in your project. If it's part of an external library, ensure that the library is imported. If it's missing, you may need to define the CheckResult struct or type in your codebase.

Lint Issue: undefined: Scenario

• Location: Line 163, Column 74
• Code Snippet:

  PassTextCheck(ctx context.Context, scenario Scenario, text string) (*CheckResult, error)

• Suggestion: It appears that the Scenario type is not defined or imported. Verify that you have defined the Scenario type in your code or imported it from the correct package. If it's supposed to be an enum or a set of constants, ensure they are correctly declared.

Lint Issue: undefined: Scenario

• Location: Line 218, Column 75
• Code Snippet:

  PassImageCheck(ctx context.Context, scenario Scenario, ossBucketName, ossObjectName string) (*CheckResult, error)

• Suggestion: Similar to the previous issue, ensure that the Scenario type is correctly defined or imported in your project. Check for any missing imports or typos in the type name.

Lint Issue: undefined: CheckResult

• Location: Line 155, Column 13
• Code Snippet:

  return &CheckResult{IsSensitive: false}, nil

• Suggestion: This issue is similar to the second lint issue mentioned. Ensure that the CheckResult type is correctly defined in your project or imported from an external library.

Lint Issue: undefined: CheckResult

• Location: Line 160, Column 10
• Code Snippet:

  return &CheckResult{IsSensitive: false}, nil

• Suggestion: As with the other CheckResult related issues, confirm that this type is defined within your project or that the correct package is imported. If missing, define the CheckResult struct or type accordingly.

builder/store/database/access_token.go

Lint Issue: undefined: defaultDB

• Location: Line 38

• Code Context:

  func NewAccessTokenStore() AccessTokenStore {
      return &accessTokenStoreImpl{
          db: defaultDB,
      }
  }

• Actionable Suggestion:
  It appears that defaultDB is referenced but not defined within the scope of your NewAccessTokenStore function or anywhere else in the provided file. To resolve this issue, ensure that defaultDB is properly defined and accessible within this context. If defaultDB is intended to be a global variable or a constant representing a default database connection, you might need to define it at the package level. Alternatively, if defaultDB is supposed to be passed as a parameter or injected through some other means, adjust the function signature or the struct definition accordingly. For example, if defaultDB is a global variable, ensure it is declared and initialized outside of any function:

  var defaultDB *DB // Assuming DB is the type you're working with
  
  func init() {
      // Initialize defaultDB with a valid DB connection
  }

  Or, if it should be passed into the function, consider changing the function to accept it as a parameter:

  func NewAccessTokenStore(db *DB) AccessTokenStore {
      return &accessTokenStoreImpl{
          db: db,
      }
  }

common/tests/testutils.go

Lint Issue: undefined: testcontainers

• Location: Line 75, Column 11
• Code Snippet:

  reuse := testcontainers.CustomizeRequestOption(

• Suggestion: Ensure that the testcontainers package is correctly imported at the top of your file. If it's missing, add import "github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-go" to your import statements.

Lint Issue: undefined: testcontainers

• Location: Line 76, Column 13
• Code Snippet:

  func(req *testcontainers.GenericContainerRequest) error {

• Suggestion: Verify that the testcontainers package is imported and accessible. If the package is imported but the error persists, check if GenericContainerRequest is a valid type within the testcontainers package.

Lint Issue: undefined: testcontainers

• Location: Line 87, Column 3
• Code Snippet:

  pc, err := postgres.Run(ctx, "postgres:15.7", reuse, postgres.WithDatabase(cname),

• Suggestion: Confirm that the testcontainers package is imported. If the import is correct, ensure that the Run method is available within the postgres package of testcontainers. It might require updating the package or reviewing the documentation for the correct method usage.

---

Please make the suggested changes to improve the code quality.

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: describe of the Merge Request (MR) could not be completed successfully.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

[SeanHH86]

lgtm

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.