You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Here's a rendering of the LUMO for benzene (file is attached - unzip to get benzene.fchk):
With the current code, I get a very different look:
The problem is with the mesh for the negative isosurface (it's the mesh2 in the code). The code sets m_reverseWinding and inverts the iso value (i.e., not 0.03 but -0.03)
@perminder-17 - any thoughts on this? It seems as if the Flying Edges is gluing together the two parts of the mesh even though the isovalues are very small.
Hmm..probably the issue behind is with m_reverseWinding. I'll check it very soon, in marching cubes algorithm we sets the vertices and normals by looking at the m_reverseWinding but in flying-edges I think I have missed that. I'll fix it very soon, Sorry for the oversight.
Here's a rendering of the LUMO for benzene (file is attached - unzip to get benzene.fchk):
With the current code, I get a very different look:
The problem is with the mesh for the negative isosurface (it's the
mesh2
in the code). The code sets m_reverseWinding and inverts the iso value (i.e., not 0.03 but -0.03)For example, the triangles are a bit weird too:
benzene.fchk.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: