Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix remove_flyback algorithm #318

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ercius
Copy link
Collaborator

@ercius ercius commented Aug 22, 2024

The current algorithm for removing the flyback doe snot properly account for multiple frames per probe position.

This new algorithm is designed to account for that problem.

Its not ready yet. I need to build new stempy version to test it.

Peter Ercius ncem-gauss jupyter added 2 commits August 22, 2024 16:46
@ercius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ercius commented Aug 23, 2024

This looks like it is working. Can we issue a release candidate with this and the other pull requests? I want to test it a little more thoroughly.

@cjh1
Copy link
Member

cjh1 commented Sep 3, 2024

@ercius Sorry for the delayed response. As part of the CI for a PR a wheel is built ( just download the the artifacts ) you can use that for testing. The CI is currently failing because you are removing scan_positions and it is still referenced in the version 3 block.

Peter Ercius ncem-gauss jupyter added 2 commits September 16, 2024 10:58
@ercius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ercius commented Sep 16, 2024

@cjh1 Thanks for finding my error. I've added in scan_positions and will grab the artifact to more fully test this new algorithm.

@ercius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ercius commented Sep 16, 2024

@cjh1 I think this is good to merge. Can you take a look?

Copy link
Member

@cjh1 cjh1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cjh1 cjh1 merged commit 0188853 into OpenChemistry:master Oct 2, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants