Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Long lease servers don't need an app #30775

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: integration
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jonhawkes
Copy link
Member

@jonhawkes jonhawkes commented Feb 12, 2025

################################################################################################

@jonhawkes jonhawkes self-assigned this Feb 12, 2025
@jonhawkes
Copy link
Member Author

jonhawkes commented Feb 12, 2025

!build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ❌ completed with errors/failures.)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 3 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@jonhawkes
Copy link
Member Author

jonhawkes commented Feb 13, 2025

!build (view Open Liberty Personal Build - ✅ completed successfully!)

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 3 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@jonhawkes
Copy link
Member Author

jonhawkes commented Feb 13, 2025

!build
(view Open Liberty Personal Build - ❌ completed with errors/failures.)
spawn.fullfat.buckets=com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.base,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.db2.0,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.db2.0.ee10,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.db2.1,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.db2.2,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.derby.0,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.derby.0.ee10,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.derby.1,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.derby.2,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.dualFS,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.oracle.0,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.oracle.0.ee10,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.oracle.1,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.oracle.2,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.peerlocking.1,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.peerlocking.2,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.postgresql.0,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.postgresql.0.ee10,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.postgresql.1,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.postgresql.2,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.simpleFS,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.sqlserver.0,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.sqlserver.0.ee10,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.sqlserver.1,com.ibm.ws.transaction.cloud_fat.sqlserver.2

Note: Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 3 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

@joe-chacko joe-chacko self-requested a review February 13, 2025 17:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants