-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Demo improvements #8137
Demo improvements #8137
Conversation
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
kwargs=kwargs, context=context, code_item_id=code_item.id | ||
) | ||
code_item.input_policy = input_policy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why is this needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if you check the UserCode class, you can see that the input policy is actually a property that also has a setter method, so in order to save the state we need to do this. This is exactly the same mechanism as the one for the output policy
great job! |
Description
There are multiple changes meant to improve the flow of a future helm demo:
file.iter_lines()
and processingnew policy-> moved to ExecuteOncePerCombination Policy #8160ExecuteOncePerCombination
How has this been tested?
Checklist