-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
front: add e2e stdcm tests #9599
Conversation
85fa764
to
9f409ec
Compare
523b85f
to
3db814f
Compare
The behavior in CI differs from the local machine (tested with WSL and Ubuntu); the simulation results aren’t the same. I'm currently investigating |
3db814f
to
8211a9a
Compare
you should wait for #9554 to be merged then rebase, it will change some behaviours for sure |
#9554 shouldn't change any existing behavior, it only adds a script and a new docker image (the ci and running e2e tests outside of docker are completely unaffected) |
sure, I wasn't saying it about behaviors in the tests themselves |
8211a9a
to
6c0df6a
Compare
e59e079
to
78d60f9
Compare
78d60f9
to
6b16d70
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested, I got: Error: Infrastructure state did not reach 'CACHED' within the allotted 3 minutes.
front/src/applications/stdcm/components/StdcmResults/StdcmResultsTable.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for this new PR, nice to see some tests for this new stdcm UI. Reviewed in peer with @Akctarus.
Left various comments.
The launch of the tests in debug mode went perfect at the first try and for the second try, the infra won't load and all tests are failing :/
Also, since I didn't wait for tests to end, I'm stuck with small infra in stdcm when not in debug mode. How can I fix this ? |
@SharglutDev you should update stdcm env using |
@Akctars It's an |
Lgtm and tested for me. Great job ! As @Yohh doesn't have his e2e maintainer privilege yet, I'm waiting for his approve to do mine. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested, LGTM, ty for this PR !
Signed-off-by: maymanaf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: maymanaf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: maymanaf <[email protected]> front: add fourth stdcm e2e test Signed-off-by: maymanaf <[email protected]>
acb3303
to
29fe89e
Compare
Closes #9265