Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(scripts): remove from stalled after moving to wait or delayed #2731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2024
Merged

fix(scripts): remove from stalled after moving to wait or delayed #2731

merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

roggervalf
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

manast
manast approved these changes May 10, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@manast manast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, this seems like a quite serious bug actually.

@roggervalf roggervalf merged commit 7ee8f74 into OptimalBits:develop May 10, 2024
6 checks passed
@roggervalf roggervalf deleted the perf-remove-lock branch May 10, 2024 13:51
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2024
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 4.12.3 [skip ci]
afcf11c 
## [4.12.3](v4.12.2...v4.12.3) (2024-05-10)

### Bug Fixes

* **job:** validate jobKey in updateProgress and update ([#2730](#2730)) ([6d84156](6d84156))

### Performance Improvements

* **scripts:** remove token after moving to wait or delayed ([#2731](#2731)) ([7ee8f74](7ee8f74))
@manast
Copy link
Member

manast commented May 10, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.12.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@manast manast manast approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
released
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@roggervalf @manast