fix: updated vitest and @vitest/coverage-v8 version

[Aryan4884]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #2461

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

N/A

Summary

Upgraded packages vitest and @vitest/coverage-v8 to their latest versions.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated development dependencies to improve performance and stability.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The package.json file for the talawa-api project has been updated to reflect minor version upgrades for the @vitest/coverage-v8 and vitest dependencies. Specifically, @vitest/coverage-v8 has been upgraded from version ^2.1.2 to ^2.1.3, and vitest has been upgraded from ^2.0.5 to ^2.1.3. No other changes were made to the structure or content of the package.json file.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
package.json	Updated @vitest/coverage-v8 from ^2.1.2 to ^2.1.3 and vitest from ^2.0.5 to ^2.1.3.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Upgrade the packages vitest and @vitest/coverage-v8 from version 1.6.0 to 2.0.3. (2461)	❌	The upgrade does not meet the specified version.
Update code to accommodate new syntax, functions, methods, and classes introduced in the major version upgrade. (2461)	❌	No code updates were made to accommodate changes.
Remove any unused or unnecessary packages. (2461)	❓	Uncertainty about the necessity of the packages.

Possibly related issues

• Upgrade packages vitest and @vitest/coverage-v8 #2401: This issue focuses on upgrading vitest and @vitest/coverage-v8 dependencies together, which aligns with the changes made in this PR.

Possibly related PRs

• Migrating to eslint.config.js #2522: This PR also updates the package.json file in the devDependencies section, similar to the updates made for @vitest/coverage-v8 and vitest.

Poem

In the garden of code where the rabbits play,
New versions hop in, brightening the day.
With vitest and friends, we leap and we bound,
Upgrading our tools, new joy to be found!
Hooray for the changes, let’s dance and rejoice,
For every small update gives our code a voice! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1dc667 and eba2a3b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (1)

package.json (1)

133-133: LGTM! Verify changelogs and run tests.

The updates to @vitest/coverage-v8 (^2.1.3) and vitest (^2.1.3) align with the PR objectives. These minor version updates typically include bug fixes and improvements.

To ensure a smooth transition:

1. Review the changelogs for both packages to check for any breaking changes or required code updates.
2. Run the full test suite to confirm compatibility with the updated versions.

Also applies to: 149-149

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.51%. Comparing base (c1dc667) to head (eba2a3b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2595      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    98.58%   98.51%   -0.08%     
===========================================
  Files          356      356              
  Lines        18061    16834    -1227     
  Branches      2411     2411              
===========================================
- Hits         17806    16584    -1222     
+ Misses         252      247       -5     
  Partials         3        3              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.