-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce JUnit factory method BugChecker #319
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 11 commits
ec79df9
de71440
40b1e86
7204515
6cd9d8a
2f5f355
3db334f
048ef6e
2758fed
4ac2a0a
d7adfbc
79b2b51
a2626ee
fc6af33
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@ | ||
package tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns; | ||
|
||
import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.LinkType.CUSTOM; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.SeverityLevel.SUGGESTION; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.BugPattern.StandardTags.STYLE; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.ChildMultiMatcher.MatchType.AT_LEAST_ONE; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.allOf; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.annotations; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.anyOf; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.enclosingClass; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.hasModifier; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.isType; | ||
import static com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matchers.not; | ||
import static java.util.stream.Collectors.joining; | ||
import static tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.ConflictDetection.findMethodRenameBlocker; | ||
import static tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.Documentation.BUG_PATTERNS_BASE_URL; | ||
import static tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.MoreJUnitMatchers.HAS_METHOD_SOURCE; | ||
import static tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.MoreJUnitMatchers.TEST_METHOD; | ||
|
||
import com.google.auto.service.AutoService; | ||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList; | ||
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables; | ||
import com.google.common.collect.Streams; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.BugPattern; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.VisitorState; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.bugpatterns.BugChecker; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.bugpatterns.BugChecker.MethodTreeMatcher; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.fixes.SuggestedFix; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.fixes.SuggestedFixes; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.matchers.Description; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.matchers.Matcher; | ||
import com.google.errorprone.util.ASTHelpers; | ||
import com.sun.source.tree.AnnotationTree; | ||
import com.sun.source.tree.MethodTree; | ||
import com.sun.source.tree.StatementTree; | ||
import com.sun.source.tree.Tree.Kind; | ||
import com.sun.source.tree.VariableTree; | ||
import com.sun.tools.javac.parser.Tokens.Comment; | ||
import com.sun.tools.javac.parser.Tokens.TokenKind; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
import java.util.Optional; | ||
import java.util.stream.Stream; | ||
import javax.lang.model.element.Modifier; | ||
import javax.lang.model.element.Name; | ||
import tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.MoreASTHelpers; | ||
import tech.picnic.errorprone.bugpatterns.util.MoreJUnitMatchers; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* A {@link BugChecker} that flags non-canonical JUnit factory method declarations. | ||
* | ||
* <p>At Picnic, we consider a JUnit factory method canonical if it: | ||
* | ||
* <ul> | ||
* <li>has the same name as the test method it provides test cases for, but with a `TestCases` | ||
* suffix, and | ||
* <li>has a comment which connects the return statement to the names of the parameters in the | ||
* corresponding test method. | ||
* </ul> | ||
*/ | ||
@AutoService(BugChecker.class) | ||
@BugPattern( | ||
summary = "JUnit factory method declaration can likely be improved", | ||
link = BUG_PATTERNS_BASE_URL + "JUnitFactoryMethodDeclaration", | ||
linkType = CUSTOM, | ||
severity = SUGGESTION, | ||
tags = STYLE) | ||
public final class JUnitFactoryMethodDeclaration extends BugChecker implements MethodTreeMatcher { | ||
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; | ||
|
||
eric-picnic marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
private static final Matcher<MethodTree> HAS_UNMODIFIABLE_SIGNATURE = | ||
anyOf( | ||
annotations(AT_LEAST_ONE, isType("java.lang.Override")), | ||
allOf( | ||
not(hasModifier(Modifier.FINAL)), | ||
not(hasModifier(Modifier.PRIVATE)), | ||
enclosingClass(hasModifier(Modifier.ABSTRACT)))); | ||
|
||
/** Instantiates a new {@link JUnitFactoryMethodDeclaration} instance. */ | ||
public JUnitFactoryMethodDeclaration() {} | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public Description matchMethod(MethodTree tree, VisitorState state) { | ||
if (!TEST_METHOD.matches(tree, state) || !HAS_METHOD_SOURCE.matches(tree, state)) { | ||
return Description.NO_MATCH; | ||
} | ||
|
||
AnnotationTree methodSourceAnnotation = | ||
ASTHelpers.getAnnotationWithSimpleName( | ||
tree.getModifiers().getAnnotations(), "MethodSource"); | ||
|
||
Optional<ImmutableList<MethodTree>> factoryMethods = | ||
MoreJUnitMatchers.extractSingleFactoryMethodName(methodSourceAnnotation) | ||
.map(name -> MoreASTHelpers.findMethods(name, state)); | ||
|
||
if (factoryMethods.isEmpty() || factoryMethods.orElseThrow().size() != 1) { | ||
return Description.NO_MATCH; | ||
} | ||
|
||
MethodTree factoryMethod = Iterables.getOnlyElement(factoryMethods.orElseThrow()); | ||
ImmutableList<Description> descriptions = | ||
ImmutableList.<Description>builder() | ||
.addAll( | ||
getFactoryMethodNameFixes( | ||
tree.getName(), methodSourceAnnotation, factoryMethod, state)) | ||
.addAll(getReturnStatementCommentFixes(tree, factoryMethod, state)) | ||
.build(); | ||
|
||
descriptions.forEach(state::reportMatch); | ||
return Description.NO_MATCH; | ||
} | ||
|
||
private ImmutableList<Description> getFactoryMethodNameFixes( | ||
Name methodName, | ||
AnnotationTree methodSourceAnnotation, | ||
MethodTree factoryMethod, | ||
VisitorState state) { | ||
String expectedFactoryMethodName = methodName + "TestCases"; | ||
|
||
if (HAS_UNMODIFIABLE_SIGNATURE.matches(factoryMethod, state) | ||
|| factoryMethod.getName().toString().equals(expectedFactoryMethodName)) { | ||
return ImmutableList.of(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
Optional<String> blocker = | ||
findMethodRenameBlocker( | ||
ASTHelpers.getSymbol(factoryMethod), expectedFactoryMethodName, state); | ||
if (blocker.isPresent()) { | ||
reportMethodRenameBlocker( | ||
factoryMethod, blocker.orElseThrow(), expectedFactoryMethodName, state); | ||
return ImmutableList.of(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return ImmutableList.of( | ||
buildDescription(methodSourceAnnotation) | ||
.setMessage( | ||
String.format( | ||
"The test cases should be supplied by a method named `%s`", | ||
expectedFactoryMethodName)) | ||
.addFix( | ||
SuggestedFixes.updateAnnotationArgumentValues( | ||
methodSourceAnnotation, | ||
state, | ||
"value", | ||
ImmutableList.of("\"" + expectedFactoryMethodName + "\"")) | ||
.build()) | ||
.build(), | ||
buildDescription(factoryMethod) | ||
.setMessage( | ||
String.format( | ||
"The test cases should be supplied by a method named `%s`", | ||
expectedFactoryMethodName)) | ||
.addFix(SuggestedFixes.renameMethod(factoryMethod, expectedFactoryMethodName, state)) | ||
.build()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private void reportMethodRenameBlocker( | ||
MethodTree tree, String reason, String suggestedName, VisitorState state) { | ||
state.reportMatch( | ||
buildDescription(tree) | ||
.setMessage( | ||
String.format( | ||
"The test cases should be supplied by a method named `%s` (but note that %s)", | ||
suggestedName, reason)) | ||
.build()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private ImmutableList<Description> getReturnStatementCommentFixes( | ||
MethodTree testMethod, MethodTree factoryMethod, VisitorState state) { | ||
ImmutableList<String> parameterNames = | ||
testMethod.getParameters().stream() | ||
.map(VariableTree::getName) | ||
.map(Object::toString) | ||
.collect(toImmutableList()); | ||
|
||
String expectedComment = parameterNames.stream().collect(joining(", ", "/* { ", " } */")); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We can use the There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe extracting to a method would make the intent a bit more clear. |
||
|
||
List<? extends StatementTree> statements = factoryMethod.getBody().getStatements(); | ||
|
||
Stream<? extends StatementTree> returnStatementsNeedingComment = | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can there be more than one statement that needs a comment? Don't think so right? If so, it would require an extra test for sure (or I am missing something). Otherwise, we can improve the code a bit I think. |
||
Streams.mapWithIndex(statements.stream(), IndexedStatement::new) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you elaborate a bit on this part? Why do we need an |
||
.filter(indexedStatement -> indexedStatement.getStatement().getKind() == Kind.RETURN) | ||
.filter( | ||
indexedStatement -> | ||
!hasExpectedComment( | ||
factoryMethod, | ||
expectedComment, | ||
statements, | ||
indexedStatement.getIndex(), | ||
state)) | ||
.map(IndexedStatement::getStatement); | ||
|
||
return returnStatementsNeedingComment | ||
.map( | ||
s -> | ||
buildDescription(s) | ||
.setMessage( | ||
"The return statement should be prefixed by a comment giving the names of the test case parameters") | ||
.addFix(SuggestedFix.prefixWith(s, expectedComment + "\n")) | ||
.build()) | ||
.collect(toImmutableList()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static boolean hasExpectedComment( | ||
MethodTree factoryMethod, | ||
String expectedComment, | ||
List<? extends StatementTree> statements, | ||
long statementIndex, | ||
VisitorState state) { | ||
int startPosition = | ||
statementIndex > 0 | ||
? state.getEndPosition(statements.get((int) statementIndex - 1)) | ||
: ASTHelpers.getStartPosition(factoryMethod); | ||
int endPosition = state.getEndPosition(statements.get((int) statementIndex)); | ||
|
||
ImmutableList<Comment> comments = | ||
extractReturnStatementComments(startPosition, endPosition, state); | ||
|
||
return comments.stream() | ||
.map(Comment::getText) | ||
.anyMatch(comment -> comment.equals(expectedComment)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static ImmutableList<Comment> extractReturnStatementComments( | ||
int startPosition, int endPosition, VisitorState state) { | ||
return state.getOffsetTokens(startPosition, endPosition).stream() | ||
.filter(t -> t.kind() == TokenKind.RETURN) | ||
.flatMap(errorProneToken -> errorProneToken.comments().stream()) | ||
.collect(toImmutableList()); | ||
} | ||
|
||
private static final class IndexedStatement { | ||
private final StatementTree statement; | ||
private final long index; | ||
|
||
private IndexedStatement(StatementTree statement, long index) { | ||
this.statement = statement; | ||
this.index = index; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public StatementTree getStatement() { | ||
return statement; | ||
} | ||
|
||
public long getIndex() { | ||
return index; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It actually does more than that right 👀. It also kind of flags things about it's usages.
For that exact reason we might want to drop the
Declaration
part of this class name.Which kind of makes me doubt, does the check do too many things? Should we split it 🤔.