fix(dockerfiles/cd/builders/tiflash): fix dockerfile to avoid cache conflict with docker buildx

[wuhuizuo]

Signed-off-by: wuhuizuo [email protected]

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, it seems that the changes made in this PR are related to fixing a Dockerfile to avoid cache conflict with Docker Buildx. The changes have been made in multiple Dockerfiles for different PingCAP applications. After reviewing the diff, I didn't find any potential problems in the code changes. Therefore, this PR can be merged safely.

However, I have a suggestion to improve the readability of the Dockerfiles. In the Dockerfile of all the applications, it is recommended to add a space between the label name and its value. For example, in the following lines in all Dockerfiles:

LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source = "https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts"

Change it to:

LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source="https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts"

This will make the Dockerfiles more consistent and easier to read.

[wuhuizuo]

/approve

[wuhuizuo]

/approve

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wuhuizuo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [wuhuizuo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the diff, it seems like the only change made in this pull request is to fix a Dockerfile for TiFlash to avoid cache conflict with Docker Buildx. The change made is straightforward and does not introduce any new functionality or dependencies.

However, there are a few suggestions I would like to make to improve the quality of this pull request:

1. Provide more details in the pull request description: The pull request description is currently empty. It would be helpful to provide more context on why this change is necessary, and how it was tested.

2. Use consistent syntax for Dockerfile labels: In the changed Dockerfile, the LABEL syntax for org.opencontainers.image.source is inconsistent. It should be either LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source="https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts" or LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source="https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts". I suggest using the former syntax.

3. Remove unnecessary comments: In the changed Dockerfile, there are some unnecessary comments that can be removed. For example, the comment # install packages. is repeated twice, and can be removed from one of the places.

Overall, the changes made in this pull request are good, but I would suggest making the above improvements for better clarity and consistency.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Based on the pull request title and description, this seems to be a fix for a Dockerfile in the dockerfiles/cd/builders/tiflash directory. The change is related to avoiding cache conflicts with Docker buildx.

The diff shows that the only change made is replacing LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source = with LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source in the Dockerfile.

There don't seem to be any potential problems with this change. It is a minor fix to the Dockerfile that should not affect the functionality of the image.

However, it is always a good idea to test the image after this change is merged to make sure it is still working as expected.

Suggestion for the pull request author:

• Consider adding a more descriptive pull request title and description to make it easier for reviewers to understand the purpose of the change.
• Consider adding a test plan to ensure that the image is still functional after the changes are merged.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request primarily includes changes in Dockerfiles and other configuration files. Here is the summary of the key changes:

1. White-space and trailing spaces are cleaned up in many files. This does not affect the functionality but improves the code readability.

2. The syntax of Docker LABEL instructions is corrected in multiple Dockerfiles, by removing the = sign.

3. A new .pre-commit-config.yaml file is added for implementing pre-commit hooks. This will help in enforcing coding standards and can catch issues before code is committed.

4. In the dockerfiles/cd/builders/tiflash/Dockerfile, the git clone command is modified to remove the cache directory after cloning the llvm-project. This can help in avoiding conflicts with Docker build cache.

5. The 'No newline at end of file' issue is fixed in multiple files.

Potential problems and suggestions:

1. While the changes seem good, there are no details provided in the pull request description about the changes, why they are made, and what they are supposed to fix or improve. It's a good practice to write a clear description for each pull request.

2. The .pre-commit-config.yaml file is added but there is no information about whether these hooks have been tested or not. Make sure that these hooks are working as expected.

3. Ensure all Dockerfiles are well-tested after the changes.

4. Some changes are related to the formatting (like removing trailing spaces). It's recommended to set up a linter or formatter in the CI/CD pipeline to automatically check and fix (if possible) such issues. This will reduce manual efforts and help maintain the code quality.

5. Remember to update any related documentation if needed due to these changes.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Key Changes

1. In various shell scripts, arguments to the $script command are now quoted. This is to prevent word splitting or globbing issues if the variables contain spaces or special characters. This is an important change that helps mitigate potential bugs or unexpected behavior.

2. A new file .pre-commit-config.yaml is added to set up pre-commit hooks which include end-of-file-fixer, trailing-whitespace, shellcheck, and gitleaks. These hooks help to ensure code quality and security by automatically checking for common issues before commits are made.

3. In various Dockerfiles, the docker build and docker push commands now quote their arguments. This is similar to the change in the shell scripts and helps prevent issues with spaces or special characters in the variables.

4. In Dockerfiles, the syntax for setting labels is corrected from LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source = "https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts" to LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source "https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts". The = sign is not necessary and can be omitted.

5. In dockerfiles/cd/builders/tiflash/Dockerfile, the code is modified to clone the LLVM project to /tmp/llvm-project instead of /tmp/llvm/llvm-project, and the temporary project directory is deleted after building and installing libc++.

Potential Problems

1. If any of the quoted variables in the shell scripts or Dockerfiles are expected to contain spaces that should result in separate arguments, this change will break that functionality. For example, if $version is expected to sometimes contain a string like "v1.2.3 v1.2.4", the new code will treat this as a single argument rather than two separate versions.

2. The pre-commit hooks are set to throw errors which will prevent commits from being made if any issues are detected. If there are any existing issues in the code that would be caught by these hooks, this could prevent developers from making commits until those issues are fixed.

Suggestions

1. Review the changes to ensure that the newly quoted variables in shell scripts and Dockerfiles are not expected to contain spaces that should result in separate arguments.

2. Run the pre-commit hooks on the existing codebase to see if they catch any existing issues. If they do, decide whether to fix those issues now or adjust the severity of the hooks to allow commits to be made with warnings instead of errors.

3. It's not clear from the pull request description what issue this is intended to solve. It would be helpful to have more context about what problem was observed with the previous Dockerfile for TiFlash, how these changes fix that problem, and how the change was tested.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

This pull request appears to contain several categories of changes:

1. Quoting Variables in Shell Scripts: The author has added quotes around variables in several shell scripts. This is a good practice as it prevents word splitting and pathname expansion, which could lead to unexpected behavior if the variables contain spaces or special characters.

2. Syntax and Formatting Fixes: There are several changes that seem to be made for better syntax and formatting. For example, whitespace has been added or removed for better readability, the = sign in the Dockerfile LABEL instructions has been removed as it's not necessary, and newline characters have been added at the end of files.

3. .pre-commit-config.yaml File: A new file, .pre-commit-config.yaml, has been added to the repository. This file is used to configure pre-commit hooks, which are scripts that automatically run every time you commit changes. The hooks specified in this file are aimed at improving code quality by automatically fixing trailing whitespace, enforcing end-of-file newlines, checking shell scripts with ShellCheck, and checking for secrets with Gitleaks.

4. Dockerfile Changes: There are a number of changes to various Dockerfiles. Most notably, the LABEL instructions have been modified (most likely for consistency), and variables in the docker build commands have been quoted.

Potential issues and improvements:

• Lack of Context: The pull request's description doesn't provide much context about the changes. It would be helpful if the author could provide more details about the changes and their purpose.
• ShellCheck Warnings: ShellCheck might produce warnings for the unquoted $profile variable in the ci.sh script. It would be probably safer to quote this variable as well.
• Gitleaks Configuration: Depending on the specifics of the project, the Gitleaks configuration may need to be adjusted. For example, if the project allows certain types of secrets to be committed, these should be whitelisted in the Gitleaks configuration.
• Pre-commit hook versions: The author might want to specify versions for the pre-commit hooks to ensure consistent behavior across different development environments.
• Consistent Label Format: In various Dockerfiles, the format of the LABEL instruction seems to be inconsistent. It would be better to use a consistent format across all Dockerfiles.
• Redundant Comments: There are a few comments in the code which are either redundant or not clear. These comments should be improved or removed.
• Test Coverage: Ensure that the changes are covered by tests. If not, consider adding some tests to verify the expected behavior.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

This pull request contains changes related to scripts and Dockerfiles in the project.

Key Changes:

1. The scripts have been modified to use double quotes around variables to prevent word-splitting and globbing. This is a good practice in bash scripting to prevent unexpected behavior if the variables contain spaces, wildcards, etc.

2. A new .pre-commit-config.yaml file has been added for pre-commit hooks configuration.

3. Changes in Dockerfiles mostly involve correcting the assignment of LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source. The assignment operator = has been replaced with a space to match the Dockerfile syntax.

4. The build() function in build-old.sh script has been modified to use double quotes around the variables in docker build and push commands.

5. The main() function in gen-delivery-images-with-config.sh script has been modified to use double quotes around variables and removed unnecessary variables declaration.

Potential Problems:

1. The LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source correction is a good catch but it won't have a significant impact on the functionality as it's mainly used for metadata and documentation purposes.

2. The use of double quotes around the variables in scripts is a good practice. However, the changes need to be tested to ensure that they don't cause any unexpected behavior.

3. The pre-commit hooks configuration file has been added but it's not clear if these hooks are being used or if they have been tested.

Fixing Suggestions:

1. Ensure that the scripts are thoroughly tested after the changes, particularly where the variables are now enclosed in double quotes.

2. Verify that the pre-commit hooks are working as expected and are useful for the project. If they are not needed, it might be better to remove the configuration file to avoid confusion.

3. Check all Dockerfiles in the project and correct the LABEL syntax if needed.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

This pull request seems to be focused on improving the quality of the codebase by applying proper quoting to shell variables to prevent possible word splitting or globbing, fixing misuse of Docker labels, and removing trailing whitespaces.

Here are the key changes:

1. Variables in shell scripts are properly quoted to avoid word splitting or globbing issues, which can lead to unpredictable behavior or security vulnerabilities.
2. Docker labels are corrected from LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source = "https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts" to LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source "https://github.com/PingCAP-QE/artifacts" which is the right syntax.
3. Trailing whitespaces are removed across various files.
4. A pre-commit hook configuration file is added to automate the checking process for the above issues in the future.

Potential problems:

1. The changes are spread across multiple files and contexts. It would be good to test these changes thoroughly to ensure no side effects or unexpected behavior.
2. The pre-commit hook configurations added are assuming the developers have certain tools (like shellcheck, gitleaks, etc.) installed in their local environment. If they don't, the pre-commit checks will fail.

Fixing suggestions:

1. The changes are mostly straightforward and don't seem to introduce any new logic or functionality, so no concrete fixing suggestion here. However, it's recommended to run the existing test suite (if any) to ensure everything works as expected after these changes.
2. For the pre-commit hook configurations, you might want to add instructions in your project's README or contributing guidelines, telling developers to install the necessary tools.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request primarily contains changes in shell script files and Dockerfiles. Here is a summarization of the key changes:

1. Shell script files: The changes mainly involve adding quotes around shell variables within commands to prevent errors when the variables contain spaces or special characters. This is a good practice and can avoid unexpected behavior or errors.

2. Dockerfiles: The changes correct the format of the LABEL instruction by removing the equal sign (=) between the label key and value.

3. Misc changes: A new pre-commit configuration file is added to the project to automate some checks before committing changes, and an incorrect assignment of the dest_tags variable is removed in the gen-delivery-images-with-config.sh script.

Potential issues:

1. The new pre-commit configuration file introduces several new hooks, but it's not clear if these hooks are compatible with the current project setup.

2. The removal of the dest_tags variable assignment in the gen-delivery-images-with-config.sh script could be a problem if the variable is used later in the script.

Fixing suggestions:

1. Please verify and ensure that the added pre-commit hooks are compatible with the project's existing linting and check rules.

2. If the dest_tags variable is used later in the gen-delivery-images-with-config.sh script, please ensure its value is correctly assigned before use.

Overall, the changes in this pull request seem to enhance the robustness of the shell scripts and correct the Dockerfile syntax. However, the potential issues mentioned above should be addressed before merging.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Summary of Key Changes:

1. Changes are mostly made in shell scripts and Dockerfiles.
2. Quotes have been added around shell script variables to avoid word splitting and globbing.
3. Some trailing whitespaces are removed.
4. The Docker LABEL org.opencontainers.image.source has been rectified from org.opencontainers.image.source = to org.opencontainers.image.source.
5. A new file .pre-commit-config.yaml is added for pre-commit hooks.
6. The syntax of ENTRYPOINT in Dockerfiles is corrected to avoid error related to no newline at the end of the file.
7. Some minor changes are made in the Dockerfiles related to the format of shell commands.

Potential Issues:

1. There is no context given about what these shell scripts and Dockerfiles are supposed to do, so it's hard to say if these changes might break something.
2. It's not clear if the new .pre-commit-config.yaml file is properly set up.
3. The pull request does not contain any unit tests or integration tests related to the changes made.

Suggested Fixes:

1. The changes seem straightforward and mostly involve syntax corrections, so there might be no need for fixes.
2. If the new .pre-commit-config.yaml file is not properly set up, you may need to review it and fix any issues.
3. It would be a good idea to add unit tests or integration tests to ensure the changes don't break anything.
4. If there are any issues with the changes made, they will likely need to be fixed on a case-by-case basis. You may need to review each change made and make sure it is correct and doesn't break anything.
5. The pull request description does not provide any details about the changes made. It would be helpful to add a detailed description explaining what was changed and why.

[ti-chi-bot]

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

The pull request is made to fix the Dockerfile to avoid cache conflict with docker buildx. The main changes in this pull request can be summarized as follows:

1. The author updated the Dockerfiles multiple times. The changes include adding quotes around variables in shell scripts, updating the syntax of several Dockerfile instructions, and removing trailing whitespace.

2. The author added a new pre-commit configuration file (.pre-commit-config.yaml).

3. There are changes in shell scripts, specifically in the handling of variable expansion. The variables are now enclosed in double quotes to prevent word splitting and pathname expansion.

Potential issues:

1. The pull request lacks a proper description. The author only signed the PR but did not provide any information about the changes made.

2. The changes are not directly related to the title of the pull request. While the title mentions fixing a Dockerfile for cache conflict with docker buildx, the changes are more related to code style and syntax rather than an actual fix for a caching issue.

Suggestions for fixing these issues:

1. The pull request should have a detailed description explaining the changes made. This could include the reason for the changes, the expected impact, and any potential side effects. This would make it easier for others to understand the purpose of the changes.

2. If the changes are not directly related to the stated purpose of the pull request (fixing a Dockerfile to avoid cache conflict with docker buildx), the title and description should be updated to accurately reflect the scope of the changes.

3. It would be helpful if the author could provide more context or explanation for the changes, especially if they are not self-explanatory. For example, why was it necessary to add quotes around the variables in the shell scripts?

4. To ensure that the changes do not introduce any unexpected behavior or bugs, it would be a good idea to add or update tests that cover the changes made.