-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open usdview without specifying a file #3321
Open
MishDivyAmzn
wants to merge
1
commit into
PixarAnimationStudios:dev
Choose a base branch
from
MishDivyAmzn:dev_usdview_no_file_path
base: dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be something unique, like when we are creating temp files? It's probably unlikely, but if a bunch of "file-less" usdview's are launched and you do live-editing and want to save out the overrides from more than one, if you go with the recommendation you'll stomp your results. OTOH, you will see that the suggestion is the same for both, and have the ability to change it. Just a thought to consider.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
... if you do go that route, given that there's multiple uses of this recommended name, and only one "empty/new stage" per usdview, Seems like we would want just one unique name per-process, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point! The unique names usually look a bit ugly to people, so I wasn't sure about it :). I can replace this function with the following if people think this would be better.
The above function would make a unique name suggestion based on process ID and current datetime (millisecond precision), so almost unique everytime. But could be a bit jarring to look at. Open to suggestions :)
Here's an example of a potential suggestion from the above function:
new_file_12345_20240927_154510_12
We can potentially remove the
datetime
portion if we just need a unique name per process ID.Thanks for the feedback, lmk if anything else stands out.