Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2nd Order NAE Constraints #1036

Open
wants to merge 89 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

2nd Order NAE Constraints #1036

wants to merge 89 commits into from

Conversation

dpanici
Copy link
Collaborator

@dpanici dpanici commented May 24, 2024

  • make tests for this
  • write out the coefficients in a simpler form (see below)
  • add some warning or error for when trying to fix lambda and using asym qsc NAE constraints, since the qsc lambda does not necessarily have zero FSA which can cause the linear constraint projection to error out
  • adjust Rlmn Zlmn when shifting lambda on axis for asym

dpanici added 30 commits March 8, 2023 21:26
Copy link
Member

@f0uriest f0uriest left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haven't gone over all the math in detail, but if you and eduardo both say its correct I'll trust you.

@f0uriest f0uriest requested a review from SebereX January 21, 2025 03:07
+ X1phic * dR0 * dX1phic / 2 / R0**2
- X1phis * dR0 * dX1phis / 2 / R0**2
+ X1phic**2 * ddR0 / 4 / R0**2
- X1phis**2 * ddR0 / 4 / R0**2
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dpanici @f0uriest R_2_0, R_2_neg2 and R_2_2 can be simplified collecting terms for faster evaluation. Otherwise implementation of second order looks correct. As Rory said, add the Mathematica file or pdf for reference.

Notes
----
follows eqns 30a and 30b in NAE2DESC document
"""
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you have a test or something like that to check the correct implementation of these coefficients?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None beyond testing a solve with them, I can make one to test at least like the symmetries of each one or something though.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@dpanici dpanici requested a review from f0uriest February 18, 2025 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants