-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gene level parsimony option in protein association dialog #2764
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a668d62
- added gene level parsimony option in protein association dialog
chambm e725032
* resolved resx split conflicts
chambm 0d71585
* fixed duplicate calls to parsimony calculation when changing some o…
chambm d50fc21
Change a couple of "ReferenceValue<PeptideDocNode>" back to "PeptideD…
4fcb148
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/origin/master' into Skyline/wor…
1bd5be0
* incorporated Nick's review recommendations
chambm ad5d9ab
Merge branch 'master' into Skyline/work/20231025_gene_level_parsimony
chambm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
21 changes: 21 additions & 0 deletions
21
pwiz_tools/Skyline/EditUI/AssociateProteinsDlg.Designer.cs
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of having a name-only argument, do you think we should have an argument called "associate-proteins-parsimony-level" where the valid values are "protein" (default) or "gene"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered that in concert with using a combobox in the Associate Proteins dialog rather than 2 checkboxes. It was easier to implement as just an additional checkbox, and I didn't see a significant reason to prefer a combobox, but if you see one then I'm happy to consider it.