-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Experiments on v0.11 #276
Experiments on v0.11 #276
Conversation
CI fails because this needs other repos in the epic to be patched |
af5e9dd
to
5160fd5
Compare
5160fd5
to
3111fb2
Compare
3111fb2
to
cc8e663
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.0%) is below the target coverage (60.0%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #276 +/- ##
=======================================
+ Coverage 2.8% 2.9% +0.1%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1920 1857 -63
=======================================
Hits 53 53
+ Misses 1867 1804 -63
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Merging with the same note as in RGB-WG/rgb-core#285 (comment) |
Experimental changes from Bitfinex team into an experimental branch. nACK from me, but they want to experiment and requested a `v0.11.1-alpha.1`, which will not be recommended for any use at least until I will do a full review of the stuff in it.
This PR is part of a v0.11 fixes epic, see RGB-WG/rgb-tests#30 for an overview.