Skip to content

[DM/PCI] Add /proc access in RT-Smart user #10196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GuEe-GUI
Copy link
Contributor

@GuEe-GUI GuEe-GUI commented Apr 17, 2025

拉取/合并请求描述:(PR description)

[

  1. Add ROM base info.
  2. Save th PM status.

Build pciutils for testing:

make HOST=rt_thread_smart CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-musleabi- ZLIB=no

The ZLIB can set yes or ignore if build in userapp

lspci

]

当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR

必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):

  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个草稿版本 This PR is for a code-review and is intended to get feedback
  • 本拉取/合并请求是一个成熟版本 This PR is mature, and ready to be integrated into the repo

代码质量 Code Quality:

我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:

  • 已经仔细查看过代码改动的对比 Already check the difference between PR and old code
  • 代码风格正确,包括缩进空格,命名及其他风格 Style guide is adhered to, including spacing, naming and other styles
  • 没有垃圾代码,代码尽量精简,不包含#if 0代码,不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up
  • 所有变更均有原因及合理的,并且不会影响到其他软件组件代码或BSP All modifications are justified and not affect other components or BSP
  • 对难懂代码均提供对应的注释 I've commented appropriately where code is tricky
  • 代码是高质量的 Code in this PR is of high quality
  • 已经使用formatting 等源码格式化工具确保格式符合RT-Thread代码规范 This PR complies with RT-Thread code specification
  • 如果是新增bsp, 已经添加ci检查到.github/workflows/bsp_buildings.yml 详细请参考链接BSP自查

1. Add ROM base info.
2. Save th PM status.

Signed-off-by: GuEe-GUI <2991707448@qq.com>
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR introduces /proc filesystem support for PCI devices in RT-Smart, enabling runtime access to PCI configuration and ROM base information. Key changes include the addition of a new procfs interface in procfs.h/procfs.c, integration of procfs attach/detach calls in PCI probe and remove workflows, and updates to PCI device structures and ROM resource management.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
components/drivers/pci/procfs.h New header defining procfs related functions for PCI devices.
components/drivers/pci/procfs.c Implements read, write, and initialization for procfs access.
components/drivers/pci/probe.c Integrates procfs attach/detach in device scan and removal.
components/drivers/pci/pme.c Updates power management status upon configuration writes.
components/drivers/pci/pci.c Sets ROM base, size, and flags on PCI device resource probing.
components/drivers/pci/SConscript Conditional inclusion of procfs.c based on build dependency.
components/drivers/include/drivers/pci.h Augments the PCI device structure with power management and ROM fields.

rt_pci_read_config_u8(pdev, pos, &val);
copy_to_user(buf, &val, sizeof(val));

++buf;
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Apr 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incrementing a void pointer (buf) directly may cause portability issues with strict C standards. Consider casting buf to a char* before performing pointer arithmetic, for example: buf = (char*)buf + 1;

Suggested change
++buf;
buf = (char*)buf + 1;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is piece of garbage C standard imposes.

copy_from_user(&val, buf, sizeof(val));
rt_pci_write_config_u8(pdev, pos, val);

++buf;
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Apr 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incrementing a const void pointer (buf) directly for pointer arithmetic may lead to undefined behavior. Consider casting buf to a const char* before performing arithmetic, for example: buf = (const char*)buf + 1;

Suggested change
++buf;
buf = (const char*)buf + 1;

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

garbage, too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants