Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing the export of masks for
.
andj
#6198Removing the export of masks for
.
andj
#6198Changes from 1 commit
c164809
db788a1
f6c1390
b85f6a9
cbb6c39
bc9af4c
6167db2
04813e9
675865c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this will cause an error because we aren't exporting J
so i added
j
to list where internal-only non exposed functions are importedis this better or just not changing error ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry, I think you misread the suggested edit -- in mine the "new" test is commented out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh i am sorry , i didn't notice 😓
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done, plz check it out
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know how this passed, but test 715 is now failing locally on my system and I think it should have failed in our CI too.
Since we leave the
J
function in line 2773 the behavior should already be the future behavior?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ben-schwen I don't know what's happening but current master branch doesn't seem to be failing test 715 in my local system,
sorry i don't understand much, are you saying that J should be behaving as defined in data.table.R ? we aren't exporting J from our Namespace nor we import it where internal-only non exposed functions are imported in tests.Rraw , so AFAIK i don't think tests.Rraw have access to function
j
hence the errorerror=base_messages$missing_function("J")
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @ben-schwen are you still facing this issue, plz inform me if I can be of help :)