RF simple2 query for more exhaustively defined sorting, tuned up formatting of .sparql, new produced output #18
Conversation
…twareLabel ?laterality ?softwareLabel ?volume to achieve clear and deterministic order which would group results per subject nicely and deterministically
…rsion of query
=== Do not change lines below ===
{
"chain": [],
"cmd": "bash -c 'GRAPHDB_URL=http://localhost:8889/bigdata; export GRAPHDB_API_URL=\"$GRAPHDB_URL/sparql\"; output=queries/simple2_query_output.csv; /usr/bin/time curl -X POST \"${{GRAPHDB_API_URL}}\" --data-binary \"@queries/simple2_query.sparql\" -H \"Accept: text/csv\" -H \"Content-Type: application/sparql-query\" >| \"$output\"'",
"exit": 0,
"extra_inputs": [],
"inputs": [],
"outputs": [],
"pwd": "."
}
^^^ Do not change lines above ^^^
|
now that we moved and I acquired super-powers I will try to push this effort forward by accepting my own PRs if left without statement of showstoppers from requested reviewers. For this one - I would appreciate reviews by this Fri March 1st. Invited @satra and @dbkeator but I would welcome all @ReproNim/trd1 folks and @dnkennedy as well ;-) |
|
@yarikoptic - the query changes look cosmetic, so fine with me as long as it runs and produces proper output. is the csv based on data in reprolake? or some local store? |
|
Thank you @satra! I think it produces the same (besides order is different as intended). Is there an endpoint I could expect to run the query against and get old result??? |
|
Hi, The Readme.md file here shows how to upload the NIDM files into a local Blazegraph instance and do the queries. We haven't written up instructions on querying ReproLake but I think @jgrethe could probably give some instruction. I'm not entirely sure how all this will scale as we change NIDM files here and/or change what's in ReproLake, the query returns may get out of sync. This repo was originally just a scratch space for testing, development, etc. The ReproLake was our definitive externally-facing NIDM store....or at least that's how I always thought about it.... |
| ?measure a/rdfs:subClassOf nidm:DataElement; | ||
| rdfs:label ?softwareLabel; | ||
| nidm:measureOf ilxb:ilx_0112559 ; | ||
| nidm:datumType ilxb:ilx_0738276 . |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
more indentation would help with readability here
|
@yarikoptic - I'm testing oxigraph again on the query that Jeff gave and now on this, but I don't have any reasonable times (killing after running for hours without any results), but I'm looking at your script to do it this more automatically |
|
Hey folks, I just found this site with some benchmarks of RDF stores: https://github.com/ad-freiburg/qlever/wiki/QLever-performance-evaluation-and-comparison-to-other-SPARQL-engines looks very cool - and somewhat tracks our experiences. That said: the doc is made by the maintainers of one of the tools listed (QLever) |
|
Let's consider this superseded by |
I have noted in
that current output is different from what was recorded in that file before. So decided to reflect that in git. Meanwhile tuned up sparql file just a little -- defined common prefix for
http://uri.interlex.org/base/and then just adjusted formatting.