chore: NBJ watermark support for new licenses

[aleksandernsilva]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

NBJ-377

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 6332ecb

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #30469 (6332ecb) into develop (ef12ac5) will decrease coverage by 0.24%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #30469      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    51.22%   50.98%   -0.24%     
===========================================
  Files          811      809       -2     
  Lines        15113    15218     +105     
  Branches      2759     2827      +68     
===========================================
+ Hits          7741     7759      +18     
- Misses        6961     7016      +55     
- Partials       411      443      +32     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	48.26% <ø> (-0.22%)	⬇️
unit	63.91% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[hugocostadev]

Hey @aleksandernsilva you can rebase your PR to develop branch and implement the correct behavior with the License...

I also suggest to use a more generic name for water mark module, like "watermark"

[hugocostadev]

the useLicense() hooks has changed, update with your branch and make the necessary changes

[rodrigok]

@aleksandernsilva can you fix the conflicts?

sovled