fix: Message mentions displayed in the UI are outdated after changing username

[heitortanoue]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Reparse the markdown (md) field when updating messages that mention the username changed.

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

• Send a message mentioning a user.
• Change the user's username
• Check if the mentioned message is still working
  (test also the DISABLE_MESSAGE_PARSER env config to see if it is correctly disabling the parsing)

Further comments

SUP-378

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 1d3a745

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 30 packages

Name	Type
@rocket.chat/meteor	Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/models	Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services	Patch
rocketchat-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/cron	Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings	Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown	Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts	Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/license	Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf	Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground	Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration	Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1b486a1) 49.57% compared to head (1d3a745) 76.72%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop   #30774       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    49.57%   76.72%   +27.14%     
============================================
  Files         3315      277     -3038     
  Lines        81425     8963    -72462     
  Branches     16707     1695    -15012     
============================================
- Hits         40369     6877    -33492     
+ Misses       36338     1662    -34676     
+ Partials      4718      424     -4294     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	?
e2e-api	?
unit	76.72% <66.66%> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[MarcosSpessatto]

@heitortanoue Can we add some tests to cover this case and prevent that from happening in the future? We can create it in a separate PR if you prefer.

[matheusbsilva137]

Code for this approach LGTM. We just gotta check if Architecture thinks we can move on with this one or if they have any other suggestion

[matheusbsilva137]

Code LGTM. We just need to check if this approach looks fine to Architecture