Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Messages not being processed for all slack servers #34148

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lucas-a-pelegrino
Copy link
Contributor

@lucas-a-pelegrino lucas-a-pelegrino commented Dec 9, 2024

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

This PR aims to fix an issue with the onMessage() function that exited before processing messages for all slack adapters, the cause was that while inside the loop, after processing the message on the first adapter the loop exited when accessing the any of the if statements present in the function.

By replacing the return statements for continue, the loop now continues iterating through the slack adapters as expected.

Issue(s)

SUP-700

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

@lucas-a-pelegrino lucas-a-pelegrino self-assigned this Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉
If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 9, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 0a333cc

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 35 packages
Name Type
@rocket.chat/meteor Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client Patch
@rocket.chat/apps Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services Patch
@rocket.chat/cron Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client Patch
@rocket.chat/freeswitch Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service Patch
@rocket.chat/license Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/presence Patch
rocketchat-services Patch
@rocket.chat/network-broker Patch
@rocket.chat/models Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-client Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-voip Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2024

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
🚀 Deployed preview to https://RocketChat.github.io/Rocket.Chat/pr-preview/pr-34148/
on branch gh-pages at 2024-12-17 20:20 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.83%. Comparing base (0fcdc3e) to head (0a333cc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #34148   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    75.83%   75.83%           
========================================
  Files          511      511           
  Lines        22172    22172           
  Branches      5397     5397           
========================================
  Hits         16814    16814           
  Misses        4710     4710           
  Partials       648      648           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 75.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@lucas-a-pelegrino lucas-a-pelegrino marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 15:48
Copy link
Member

@matheusbsilva137 matheusbsilva137 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please add a changeset and describe what's being fixed in the PR title (instead of how)?

@lucas-a-pelegrino lucas-a-pelegrino changed the title fix: replaces return for continue inside the loop fix: Messages not being processed for all slack servers Dec 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@KevLehman KevLehman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is there any way to add, at least, units? 😬

if not, can you create a task for adding them later? (and to convert the file to TS, cause we have an eslint rule for ensuring we don't return inside of loops lol)

Copy link
Member

@matheusbsilva137 matheusbsilva137 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we should also fix onMessageDelete and addChannel methods
They also iterate on slackAdapters and are currently using return instead of continue

@lucas-a-pelegrino
Copy link
Contributor Author

is there any way to add, at least, units? 😬

if not, can you create a task for adding them later? (and to convert the file to TS, cause we have an eslint rule for ensuring we don't return inside of loops lol)

I agree, we should create tasks for migrating this service to TS.

Copy link
Contributor

@KevLehman KevLehman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pls create the tasks we mentioned to improve the logic on these adapters 🙏🏽

@jessicaschelly jessicaschelly added the stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider label Dec 17, 2024
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label Dec 17, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 7bafe03 into develop Dec 17, 2024
49 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/SUP-700 branch December 17, 2024 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants