-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge branch 'main' into sk/remove-d_prototype
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
466 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ | ||
# [Tutorial: Solution of the heat equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions](@id tutorial-heat-equation-dirichlet) | ||
|
||
We continue the previous tutorial on | ||
[solving the heat equation with Neumann boundary conditions](@ref tutorial-heat-equation-neumann) | ||
by looking at Dirichlet boundary conditions instead, resulting in a non-conservative | ||
production-destruction system. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Definition of the (non-conservative) production-destruction system | ||
|
||
Consider the heat equation | ||
|
||
```math | ||
\partial_t u(t,x) = \mu \partial_x^2 u(t,x),\quad u(0,x)=u_0(x), | ||
``` | ||
|
||
with ``μ ≥ 0``, ``t≥ 0``, ``x\in[0,1]``, and homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. | ||
We use again a finite volume discretization, i.e., we split the domain ``[0, 1]`` into | ||
``N`` uniform cells of width ``\Delta x = 1 / N``. As degrees of freedom, we use | ||
the mean values of ``u(t)`` in each cell approximated by the point value ``u_i(t)`` | ||
in the center of cell ``i``. Finally, we use the classical central finite difference | ||
discretization of the Laplacian with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions, | ||
resulting in the ODE | ||
|
||
```math | ||
\partial_t u(t) = L u(t), | ||
\quad | ||
L = \frac{\mu}{\Delta x^2} \begin{pmatrix} | ||
-2 & 1 \\ | ||
1 & -2 & 1 \\ | ||
& \ddots & \ddots & \ddots \\ | ||
&& 1 & -2 & 1 \\ | ||
&&& 1 & -2 | ||
\end{pmatrix}. | ||
``` | ||
|
||
The system can be written as a non-conservative PDS with production terms | ||
|
||
```math | ||
\begin{aligned} | ||
&p_{i,i-1}(t,\mathbf u(t)) = \frac{\mu}{\Delta x^2} u_{i-1}(t),\quad i=2,\dots,N, \\ | ||
&p_{i,i+1}(t,\mathbf u(t)) = \frac{\mu}{\Delta x^2} u_{i+1}(t),\quad i=1,\dots,N-1, | ||
\end{aligned} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
and destruction terms ``d_{i,j} = p_{j,i}`` for ``i \ne j`` as well as the | ||
non-conservative destruction terms | ||
|
||
```math | ||
\begin{aligned} | ||
d_{1,1}(t,\mathbf u(t)) &= \frac{\mu}{\Delta x^2} u_{1}(t), \\ | ||
d_{N,N}(t,\mathbf u(t)) &= \frac{\mu}{\Delta x^2} u_{N}(t). | ||
\end{aligned} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
|
||
## Solution of the non-conservative production-destruction system | ||
|
||
Now we are ready to define a [`PDSProblem`](@ref) and to solve this | ||
problem with a method of | ||
[PositiveIntegrators.jl](https://github.com/SKopecz/PositiveIntegrators.jl) or | ||
[OrdinaryDiffEq.jl](https://docs.sciml.ai/OrdinaryDiffEq/stable/). | ||
In the following we use ``N = 100`` nodes and the time domain ``t \in [0,1]``. | ||
Moreover, we choose the initial condition | ||
|
||
```math | ||
u_0(x) = \sin(\pi x)^2. | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
x_boundaries = range(0, 1, length = 101) | ||
x = x_boundaries[1:end-1] .+ step(x_boundaries) / 2 | ||
u0 = @. sinpi(x)^2 # initial solution | ||
tspan = (0.0, 1.0) # time domain | ||
nothing #hide | ||
``` | ||
|
||
We will choose three different matrix types for the production terms and | ||
the resulting linear systems: | ||
|
||
1. standard dense matrices (default) | ||
2. sparse matrices (from SparseArrays.jl) | ||
3. tridiagonal matrices (from LinearAlgebra.jl) | ||
|
||
|
||
### Standard dense matrices | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using PositiveIntegrators # load ConservativePDSProblem | ||
function heat_eq_P!(P, u, μ, t) | ||
fill!(P, 0) | ||
N = length(u) | ||
Δx = 1 / N | ||
μ_Δx2 = μ / Δx^2 | ||
let i = 1 | ||
# Dirichlet boundary condition | ||
P[i, i + 1] = u[i + 1] * μ_Δx2 | ||
end | ||
for i in 2:(length(u) - 1) | ||
# interior stencil | ||
P[i, i - 1] = u[i - 1] * μ_Δx2 | ||
P[i, i + 1] = u[i + 1] * μ_Δx2 | ||
end | ||
let i = length(u) | ||
# Dirichlet boundary condition | ||
P[i, i - 1] = u[i - 1] * μ_Δx2 | ||
end | ||
return nothing | ||
end | ||
function heat_eq_D!(D, u, μ, t) | ||
fill!(D, 0) | ||
N = length(u) | ||
Δx = 1 / N | ||
μ_Δx2 = μ / Δx^2 | ||
# Dirichlet boundary condition | ||
D[begin] = u[begin] * μ_Δx2 | ||
D[end] = u[end] * μ_Δx2 | ||
return nothing | ||
end | ||
μ = 1.0e-2 | ||
prob = PDSProblem(heat_eq_P!, heat_eq_D!, u0, tspan, μ) # create the PDS | ||
sol = solve(prob, MPRK22(1.0); save_everystep = false) | ||
nothing #hide | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using Plots | ||
plot(x, u0; label = "u0", xguide = "x", yguide = "u") | ||
plot!(x, last(sol.u); label = "u") | ||
``` | ||
|
||
|
||
### Sparse matrices | ||
|
||
To use different matrix types for the production terms and linear systems, | ||
you can use the keyword argument `p_prototype` of | ||
[`ConservativePDSProblem`](@ref) and [`PDSProblem`](@ref). | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using SparseArrays | ||
p_prototype = spdiagm(-1 => ones(eltype(u0), length(u0) - 1), | ||
+1 => ones(eltype(u0), length(u0) - 1)) | ||
prob_sparse = PDSProblem(heat_eq_P!, heat_eq_D!, u0, tspan, μ; | ||
p_prototype = p_prototype) | ||
sol_sparse = solve(prob_sparse, MPRK22(1.0); save_everystep = false) | ||
nothing #hide | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
plot(x, u0; label = "u0", xguide = "x", yguide = "u") | ||
plot!(x, last(sol_sparse.u); label = "u") | ||
``` | ||
|
||
|
||
### Tridiagonal matrices | ||
|
||
The sparse matrices used in this case have a very special structure | ||
since they are in fact tridiagonal matrices. Thus, we can also use | ||
the special matrix type `Tridiagonal` from the standard library | ||
`LinearAlgebra`. | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using LinearAlgebra | ||
p_prototype = Tridiagonal(ones(eltype(u0), length(u0) - 1), | ||
ones(eltype(u0), length(u0)), | ||
ones(eltype(u0), length(u0) - 1)) | ||
prob_tridiagonal = PDSProblem(heat_eq_P!, heat_eq_D!, u0, tspan, μ; | ||
p_prototype = p_prototype) | ||
sol_tridiagonal = solve(prob_tridiagonal, MPRK22(1.0); save_everystep = false) | ||
nothing #hide | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
plot(x, u0; label = "u0", xguide = "x", yguide = "u") | ||
plot!(x, last(sol_tridiagonal.u); label = "u") | ||
``` | ||
|
||
|
||
|
||
### Performance comparison | ||
|
||
Finally, we use [BenchmarkTools.jl](https://github.com/JuliaCI/BenchmarkTools.jl) | ||
to compare the performance of the different implementations. | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using BenchmarkTools | ||
@benchmark solve(prob, MPRK22(1.0); save_everystep = false) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
@benchmark solve(prob_sparse, MPRK22(1.0); save_everystep = false) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
By default, we use an LU factorization for the linear systems. At the time of | ||
writing, Julia uses | ||
[SparseArrays.jl](https://github.com/JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl) | ||
defaulting to UMFPACK from SuiteSparse in this case. However, the linear | ||
systems do not necessarily have the structure for which UMFPACK is optimized | ||
for. Thus, it is often possible to gain performance by switching to KLU | ||
instead. | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using LinearSolve | ||
@benchmark solve(prob_sparse, MPRK22(1.0; linsolve = KLUFactorization()); save_everystep = false) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
@benchmark solve(prob_tridiagonal, MPRK22(1.0); save_everystep = false) | ||
``` | ||
|
||
|
||
## Package versions | ||
|
||
These results were obtained using the following versions. | ||
```@example HeatEquationDirichlet | ||
using InteractiveUtils | ||
versioninfo() | ||
println() | ||
using Pkg | ||
Pkg.status(["PositiveIntegrators", "SparseArrays", "KLU", "LinearSolve", "OrdinaryDiffEq"], | ||
mode=PKGMODE_MANIFEST) | ||
nothing # hide | ||
``` |
Oops, something went wrong.