[do NOT merge] Just a draft to run packit PRT

[vsedmik]

Problem Statement

Just a draft PR to test possible regressions for Katello/katello#11058

PRT test Cases example

This run should pass, we can start here and trigger more related stuff later.

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_contentview.py
Katello:
    katello: 11058

[vsedmik]

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/api/test_contentview.py
Katello:
    katello: 11058

[vsedmik]

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/cli/test_contentviewfilter.py tests/foreman/cli/test_docker.py
Katello:
    katello: 11058

[vsedmik]

=========== 3 failed, 138 passed, 316 warnings in 4150.27s (1:09:10) ===========

2x failure on known issue of AK update:

12:59:39  E           robottelo.exceptions.CLIReturnCodeError: CLIReturnCodeError(status=64, stderr="Could not update the activation key:\n  Missing arguments for '--name'.\n", msg='Command "activation-key update" finished with status 64\nstderr contains:\nCould not update the activation key:\n  Missing arguments for \'--name\'.\n'

1x assertion failure on hammer product info here

robottelo/tests/foreman/cli/test_docker.py

Line 176 in 88e5aa0

assert repo_names.issubset({repo_['repo-name'] for repo_ in product['content']})

looks like it did not return the expected repos for that product

[ianballou]

It looks like the failing docker repo test has a very similar one right after it in robottelo. If that later test is passing, perhaps the failure is a fluke.

[vsedmik]

trigger: test-robottelo
pytest: tests/foreman/cli/test_contentviewfilter.py tests/foreman/cli/test_docker.py -k create_repos_using_same_product
Katello:
    katello: 11058

[vsedmik]

Or I wonder if repos creation failed silently and thus they weren't found in the module-scoped product (where repos from other tests within the module were present).
Anyway, let's see how it runs standalone ^^

[Gauravtalreja1]

Just for awareness, If you would like to run an upstream PRT, the PRT comment can be added directly to the Jenkins job while build with parameters, without requiring robottelo PRs, and you can also post results on any GH PRs where you wish, such as here on upstream Katello PR

[vsedmik]

Standalone it passed @ianballou ^

=== 1 passed, 140 deselected, 149 warnings in 1361.42s (0:22:41) ===

@Gauravtalreja1 @omkarkhatavkar Not sure why the PRT results comment is not visible here. The curl -L -X POST from CI was sent ok. Any idea?

[omkarkhatavkar]

Standalone it passed @ianballou ^

=== 1 passed, 140 deselected, 149 warnings in 1361.42s (0:22:41) ===

@Gauravtalreja1 @omkarkhatavkar Not sure why the PRT results comment is not visible here. The curl -L -X POST from CI was sent ok. Any idea?

Thanks for raising the issue and fix is here #16684