-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge main #1
Merge main #1
Conversation
…working on the tests.
Co-authored-by: Christoph Fröhlich <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Fröhlich <[email protected]>
commit 5595714ca3632b0cb437163363b4204a66a32e3c Author: Bijou <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 21 12:59:16 2023 -0700 Add a reliable reference topic as well commit ed915756a0ff5cb8abe9a0f9cdf69982581ce16f Author: Bijou <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 21 10:36:56 2023 -0700 Fix compiler warning commit 1985db1490fd5588cacfa90086ad624f6aff93b5 Author: Bijou <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 21 10:22:00 2023 -0700 Simplify setting of "has limits" for a particular limit commit 3e3ef86d3796c3ab3c5afd908b5f2c54e39ee31b Author: Bijou <[email protected]> Date: Mon Mar 20 12:57:01 2023 -0700 Fix service for setting joint limits in Cartesian trajectory generator commit 7df931cef8b10239da3784aba44e774aa860cceb Author: Bijou <[email protected]> Date: Sun Mar 19 14:04:18 2023 -0700 Remove position mode logic and service for setting position mode commit 33f4d5d0e1c2b7d503a99587fbc7a960eabab3e8 Author: Denis Štogl <[email protected]> Date: Thu Dec 22 09:50:23 2022 +0100 Added Cartesian Trajectory Generator. commit ccc4ab3 Author: Bence Magyar <[email protected]> Date: Sun Apr 2 08:56:45 2023 +0100 3.4.0 commit 05011b4 Author: Bence Magyar <[email protected]> Date: Sun Apr 2 08:56:12 2023 +0100 Update changelogs commit b70a8d0 Author: Christoph Fröhlich <[email protected]> Date: Thu Mar 30 07:42:27 2023 +0200 Fix broken links (ros-controls#554) commit 03dfb84 Author: Dr. Denis <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 28 20:46:14 2023 +0200 [AdmittanceController] Addintional argument in methods of ControllerInterface (ros-controls#553) * [AdmittanceController] Addintional argument in methods of ControllerInterface * Update admittance_controller.cpp commit eb76cd7 Author: Christoph Fröhlich <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 28 20:45:11 2023 +0200 Update docs (ros-controls#552) * Add missing controllers to doc index * Fix wrong forward_command controller doc
…-from-start Use time from start passed in from input reference if non-zero in CTG
…te-twist-body Modify CTG to expect twist in measured state input to be in body frame
…le_meas_state_nan Handle NaNs in measured state in CTG
…te_reset_dofs_with_values Use values, if present in reset dofs service, instead of fb to reset
…reset_dofs_bug Fix bug when two reset dofs requests sent to JTC without being processed in between
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one minor comment
# TODO(henrygerardmoore): re-enable | ||
# ament_add_gmock(test_trajectory test/test_trajectory.cpp) | ||
# target_link_libraries(test_trajectory joint_trajectory_controller) | ||
# target_compile_definitions(test_trajectory PRIVATE _USE_MATH_DEFINES) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this commented out?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me see if it can be re-enabled. If I remember correctly, it was making the build fail.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, the test is using the old version of trajectory.sample. There are a lot of them, so I thought I would leave re-enabling it until later (since the fix is more involved than just a find and replace, too). Is that okay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Did we change trajectory.sample in our fork? Then it is ok as it will get fixed when we merge upstream?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we changed that in our fork and it should be fixed when we merge upstream
Why are the builds failing? |
Signed-off-by: Henry Moore <[email protected]>
5970d61
to
17515b1
Compare
@bijoua29 builds are failing because of this: |
I guess this is fine. It should get fixed when we merge control_msgs upstream |
No description provided.